STUDIES IN THEOLOGY - POPULAR CHRISTIANITY: Genesis Thru Deuteronomy 5

Studies In Theology - 12/09/2006 (But Lot Gets To Do It - Fluffy Naked Angels & Moses Presents Another Re-run)

2007-01-11T08:39:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/09/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/09/2006

In again considering the relationships between Israel, the descendants of Essau and those of Lot - it is notable that Abraham - father of Isaac - father of Jacob (Israel) and Essau, was the uncle of Lot.

Lot is said to have begotten his line through his own daughters. ~

Even in such a procreation method as that, it is that the Lord still granted them the land that they occupied - even as contrary as sexual relations with a daughter was said to be within the Israelites. ~

This speaks more of that multiple aspect and the result of proximity in regard to interpretation - resulting effect of that influence. ~

It is presumably the same deity that forbids such within the Israelites, that the two cultures from Lot and Essau worship. ~

Though it would seem acceptable in these passages - such discrepancy presents the potential for future social upheavals. ~

In Chapter 3, verse 21, begins what is titled as Moses forbidden to enter the land. ~

When giving this thought, as previously touched on, it again suggests a sort of use in transference similar to that of the scapegoat wandering in the wilderness - which itself is similar in some ways, to even the Israelites - themselves - before entering the promised land. ~

A re-occurrence so to speak, in different forms - though consistent in that resonating quality. ~

Chapter 4 continues with an oration tone in presenting Moses as speaking to the Israelites. It also depicts Moses as referring to God as the God of our ancestors. ~

This presents th imagery of another social progression in suggesting that tendencies toward such worship fell away from God at some point, then to return, in the case of the Israelites - to a form resembling past form.

Of course there is the aspect of having lived in Egypt for generations, but it seems more than a reference to that - especially in considering the comparison to the version within the descendants of Essau and of Lot. ~

Considering the reference to a longevity in regard to God of your ancestors - and considering the differences between the cultures being cited as of that line of worship - it then tends to seem as though a certain inconsistency is actually a consistency of itself within that line of worship. ~

This then further substantiating the observation pertaining to the inverted qualities of this structure utilizing a single point of focus amidst so many other structures employing various points of focus/deities. ~

Further in chapter 4 (4:11), I find great example in the dual aspect of our existence - which then presents the possibility of a larger tier. ~

it references Mt. Sinai, and flames from the mountain shooting into the sky - then of God speaking from the heart of the fire. ~

Obviously, a common vision of hell itself, is flames and fire - and here it is that God was speaking from the fire. ~

On this level of reasoning, it is nothing less than obvious that the extremes in the idea of God and the Devil co-habitate to some degree - at least within this example from our perspective. Further, on this level of reasoning, it would be stated that these people were actually duped by the devil in their ignorance - into believing such a moment to have been of God. ~

Within the idea of entirely different entities, separate of one another - this level of reasoning means that in the extremes, considering this apparition of God being of/from/within fire - that the Devil is of the frozen element(s) conversely. ~

This level of reasoning as well could suggest that anything (especially of that natural sense) that we cannot control, especially those things seen as ominous and potentially destructive, are associated to the idea of God. ~

Of course then, in our modern day - this then topically would suggest that things such as Santa, and Jack Frost - are actually evil - of the Devil within that presented/suggested contradicting element.

Of course, in realizing that much of our realm consists of things wrought from evil, a person then has to question the level of truth in such assertions - given even further that it is the Devils ploy to deceive. ~

A rather enjoyable paradox to toy with , at the least. ~

Beyond this level of consideration and reasoning - a person then has to see the potential of a return in a cyclical sense, to the pattern of actual elements (earth, fire, water, air). ~

Speculatively, within this association of God and fire - then further considering the presence of observed differences within the same structure of worship - a person has to at least consider - within this example - that the elemental base may be at least part of that multiple aspect of influences comprising this multiple/single point of focus - in the idea of God. ~

In 4:20, there is an incredibly interesting metaphor describing Egypt as an iron smelter furnace - which then leaves a person to wonder what this means of the Israelites; does it suggest them to be iron, or to have been the fuel burned in the furnace? ~

It further suggests perhaps that God had been forging them in the wilderness - likening God to a blacksmith - and further suggesting that life in Egypt had been a conditioning of its own to precede being made into a special possession. ~

The use described thus far in the wandering and pillaging, would suggest that special possession to have been some sort of weapon. Even knowing what is said about the sword, thus perhaps rendering a likeness of; Live by the Hebrew, die by the Hebrew! It just doesn't have the same ring to it! ~

What of such representative affiliations for Essau and Lot's descendants?

Is it as stated in 4:24 that God is a devouring fire in their representations as well? ~

In 4:26 it seems as though to be suggesting Moses as God - If you break my covenant being prominent with no segue or indication to any other respect. ~

Something I find interesting in 4:34, is in referring to those present at this address Moses is giving, as if they were those Israelites actually brought out of Egypt. Stating that the Lord did the things described right before your eyes. Perhaps indicating some cyclical element as far as re-incarnation within the tribes of Israel? Perhaps indicating a use of transference and consistency within ceremony to present an aspect of no generational movement at all - as if, through the transference and consistencies - those before him represented those present when leaving Egypt. To suggest no continuance of populous in the realm of that ceremony and consistency? ~

Almost, metaphorically - as if punching in while tracking a recording. ~

01/11/2007 As a note - this then presents a sort of paradox within itself in such considerations, given that the initial people of the tribes of Israel were said to no longer be able to enter the promised land due to transgressions and 'rebellion' against the 'Lord.' To consider that with the proposed transference in symbolism - presents a potentially precarious relation. Is it, within that consideration, that such is meant to 'span' such a chasm as is the separation between the generation(s) entering the 'land' and those having been forbidden? Presenting perhaps another aspect of duality?

Further in 4:36 is something that definitely shows the potential of duality at least, if not the multiple aspects I am exploring in regard to a multiple presence in a single point of focus pertaining to deity - they heard his voice from heaven and they heard his voice from his great fire - In that alone is present descriptive facets of the modern popular understanding of heaven and hell - which, within this description it is depicted as God inhabiting both. ~

4:41 again references the cities of refuge, but only names the three that Moses sets apart on the East side of the Jordan river - 1 for each tribe (including the half tribe) residing on the East side of the river. ~

4:44 begins with describing again, laws and decrees as if in review. ~

Chapter 5, Deuteronomy - consists of re-affirming the commandments, though now in the condensed - 10 commandments - form. ~

And again speaks as if to be addressing those Israelites present at the time the commands were given from the Lord. ~

5:23 accounts for Gods voice coming from the heart of darkness - at the mountain blazing with fire. ~

This obviously contradicts the popular visions of white clouds and half naked angels strumming harps. ~

Not saying it to be a good or bad thing - but it definitely displays the potential duality at this point in the work of the Bible. ~

Further, in considering the application of such areas of text in our modern day - it could very much be likened to those popular attributes which many see to represent evil and the Devil. Which again tends to tell me that interpretation of this work seems meant more in the consideration of it on the whole - within the idea of applied ideology - than in specific, literal interpretations of rigid application. ~

Especially considering the larger social consistencies already in motion within much of society - bearing a striking resemblance to those social and political dynamics put into motion in the previous book - being the book of Numbers, the fourth book of the Bible. ~

Again, this in regard to considering applied ideology. ~

Something else as note - this review sort of tone seems very much directed at the 9 1/2 tribes going to the West side of the river - almost specifically. Being particularly interesting in and within this tone of delivery while again considering the failures presented as prediction like statements being near 4:25 and ending with 4:31.

It is as though they are almost being sent out on their own even after having presented Joshua as a leadership role. Suggesting even further that the more political sway will be with the 2 1/2 tribes remaining East of the river. ~

Almost cursing - condemning those going West across the river, to the failures and mishaps being predicted - perhaps even encouraging them to fulfill the predictions.

This being supported in 4:31 - stating that they will somehow only remain worthy because of their ancestors (which of course, were cut off so to speak, in forbidding the previous generation entry into the promised land). But reassured in this all the same - again, as if to perhaps even promote further divergence. ~

It gives me some confidence in my current perspective and explorations pertaining to progressive corruptions being vital to a healthy society.

It would appear, as stated in those brief verses - that Moses knew something of that sort then, about what appears to be human tendency toward various forms of corruptions. ~

Once warring is over, what then promotes the vigor and health of a community?

There is only so much that can be conquered until there is nothing left to conquer - and subsequently sustain a society having been built on such social motion (as was very common in that day and age).

01/11/2007 To briefly elaborate on this perspective - Historically it can be seen that such is the case in many examples of social and cultural development. It wasn't until quite recently in human history that ideologies were implemented which then provided for a social direction to sustain a healthy society without the dependence on war.

This fact then further substantiates the observation that it is most times even centuries from the time an idea is introduced - something is 'discovered' within human existence, before it is then efficiently utilized. Such can be observed in many places through out human history.

Studies In Theology - 12/08/2006 (40 Years On An 11 Day Journey? And Just A Bit Of Feta And Olive Oil With That, If You Don't Mind?)

2007-01-08T16:23:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/08/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/08/2006

Beginning with Deuteronomy, the 5th book within the Bible. ~

It begins with Moses (still not dead!) addressing the community of Israel. ~

In essence, it is a recounting of the travels now admittedly stated as wandering of the Israelites through the wilderness. Punctuating this wandering aspect in even stating that normally the journey from Mt. Sinai is only 11 days. ~

It then continues with a sort of review pertaining to things that transpired in the wilderness - including divulging that the leaders having been chosen for each tribe, also fulfilled the duties of judge and officials over their respective tribes - being instructed to hear each case of rich and poor impartially. ~

Besides substantiating those beginnings of a judicial system as explored previously, this again alludes to the presence of commerce within the nomadic community of Israelites - being the existence of a differentiation between rich and poor. ~

I find this further curious in that wandering, marauder like - pirate aspect they apparently embodied within their travels. In the larger sense, they were quite notorious in considering many of those descriptions - but within the nomadic community, were quite structured and advanced enough to contain elements of economy (commerce), agricultural cultivation and social/political structuring. ~

This is further supported in 2:25 of Deuteronomy, stating that the Lord will make people throughout the Earth tremble with fear. ~

At the beginning of the second chapter of Deuteronomy, I find something else of incredible interest pertaining to political and social aspects in the area of which this work has taken place thus far.

In 2:04, it again mentions Essau in stating that the Israelites were to pass through the land of their relatives - the descendants of Essau - and further to do so carefully in paying for food and water. ~

This becomes intriguing in the respect firstly as mentioned - the association with another culture as if it were a relative body (individual) - then further, as is described in 2:05, the Lord will not give the Israelites even one square foot of their land because he (the Lord) has already given it to the descendants of Essau. ~

In deeper consideration this then gives insight into another possible progression in an even larger sense given that what is known of Essau (and Isaac's words to both Essau and Jacob) is that he was of the warring sort early on - more previously than the descendants of Jacob. Then in considering the described happenings under Moses, a similarity appears in a procession sort of manner - regardless of the subtle differences socially between the two related cultures.

This as well is suggested as being repeated with the descendants of Lot - pertaining to respect to land. ~

Most intriguing into this mix, then is the description of a people from Crete (Greece) having invaded and settled in villages in the area of Gaza (which survives to this day as Gaza, as with several other places named within the bible).

So as not to change the direction of thought in such directions - it is with the descendants of Jacob, Essau and Lot then, that a discerned pattern had taken place and seemingly in a procession which drove out those having occupied the areas previously - some even described as giants. ~

In regard to popular understanding of the Bible in Popular Christianity - such a relationship and procession is hardly, if at all ever addressed. ~

Personally, I can recall hearing of a relationship procession in regard to variations within that area pertaining to the idea of God, from early youth. Specifically in regard to Christianity, Catholicism and Muslim/Islam - though I cannot readily recall any affiliation with the names of Lot and Essau, directly.

The time frame here, seems a bit displaced as well in such a comparison between that which I can recall and the description within this work, just from immediate recollection. ~

Still interesting no less, if only in the aspect of motion socially, within such consistencies. ~

At any rate, this procession indicates (obviously) peripheral elements of the Jewish, and then Popular Christianity structures of religion, as well. Making the previously explored divergence within the community of Israel all the more interesting pertaining to further development considering those other variations as social influences. The Israelites having a pronounced influence within their version from previous years in Egypt perhaps - through Jacob, Joseph then Moses and Aaron. While Essau (and Lot) remained (presumably) within the general area - having those influences Eastward - from Asia, and then Westward as well. ~

Considering the movement over all of what is described in recent chapters - it smacks most definitely of a larger intention - designed as it were, to perhaps even conquer the area in stages? Especially in considering the description of the destruction and implied fear to be spread through out the world. 'Complete consecration of things to the Lord by destroying them or offering.' ~

A problem with carrying on that area (warring) regarding the idea of progress, is that eventually - everything is conquered. For such designs to be maximized - development and progress must then take place after the establishing of dominance in any given civilization. ~

As a note - perhaps part of the ease and spread of Popular Christianity as a brief look at history and development in comparison with the other, similar options of the same time period - was the liberation aspect permeating the work itself? Perhaps even the more liberal elements pertaining to the female as well?

Chapter 3 accounts another of the victories and even stating having killed them all. ~

In 3:12, I find more which supports the exploration in power division within the tribes of Israel - pertaining to the divergence and as well the potential importance of the tribe of Manasseh - having split to occupy both sides of the river.

This support is in the description of the land divided on the East side of the river - containing mentionable hill country which possesses innate fortification advantages - the 1/2 of Manasseh on that side was given a full 1/2 of that hill country now of the Israelites. ~

In 3:21, it then gives further insight to that divergence in stating that Joshua was given full charge - but in a manner that suggested he resided on the West side of the Jordan river, as Moses still resided on the East side and was still making decisions - further of course, that Moses was not to enter the promised land presumably being that, on the West side of the Jordan river. ~

Further at this point is the seed of encouraging the development of such a divergence with the pronounced singling out of Caleb (Judah tribe) as having been seen as special - being sent to the West side of the Jordan river as well, then presenting a perceivable (though perhaps not entirely official) hierarchy on the West side, of Jacob, then Caleb - this of course within the decision of the Levites having 3 cities on each side of the river as well. ~

It most definitely suggests not only a divergence, but further promoted use of such a divergence in presenting a dual social dynamic. With, of course, the Levites presiding in equal presence on either side, as now does the tribe of Manasseh as well - which of course then adds to different social effects in relation to social structure on both sides of the Jordan river. ~

I should state, that given the description of the land on the East side of the Jordan river - and further, the specific want of it having been voiced, that there may be a bit of the Greenland/Iceland ploy in play here pertaining to the West side of the Jordan as stated in description and emphasis in 3:25. ~

Either way, in regard to that speculation - at this point the stage is set as it were, for some interesting potentials to develop. ~

Studies In Theology - 12/08/2006 (Considering Again, The Potentials Of A Living Metaphor)

2007-01-06T09:07:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/08/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/08/2006

In considering these social developments within the tribes of Israel in the few previous chapters - It very much supports the idea of the United States as a Living Metaphor - but more so than even just as Christ, and even further than the relation between 13 colonies and that number of tribes before the divergence at the Jordan river. ~

It definitely illustrates a larger process - a connectivity even, if only through the process of existence. ~

The development at the Jordan river even, then could be seen as corresponding to perhaps even the American Revolution itself, then further - as per the potential political areas of development within that divergence at the Jordan River could be seen as similar to the political areas which were set forward in creating the United States Government - even, and most notably - the three divisions of political power. ~

The more that I consider the idea of Representative Democracy - United States - being a metaphor, the more I can see from such a perspective pertaining to the aspects perceived in regard to something such as the Bible, as a whole. ~

This suggests to me something beyond a larger consistency and further the resonation of those firmed structures previously introduced into reality (many gaining a firm consistency in and of themselves). ~

The seat of the pants element within the early United States Government, very much stands as example in regard to the effect of those resonations. ~

Even more so, to that larger process in action as it occurred. ~

It is known that much planning and support came from some brilliant minds of the time - many having been firmly conditioned within that work called the Bible before applying themselves into and toward their own directions respectively. ~

Some rather uncanny, though notable aspects can be noted as well in regard to the geographic alignment of the Continental United States - most noticeably being the Mississippi River in this example and reference of such early developments - then of course, the location of the original 13 colonies being East of that division - then developing Westward, though - again demonstrating the off set of that larger process - not being a direct relation so to speak, but then presenting the layered effect I have addressed. ~

Meaning within this example - that while East of the Mississippi, the resonation played out of itself (combined with other facets - other consciously introduced influences), then again as expansion Westward took place - there in, demonstrating those layers in motion and off set within that larger process now having been again conditioned through the filtration of other established structures and manifesting as per - through our human perception and existence. The popular work called the Bible having been a predominant (sub conscious) influence in regard to said conditioning. ~

At this point, I do not believe that said traits were purposeful to a great degree - this being substantiated through the presence of focal efforts on new and ground breaking ideas being set into motion for the first time in an applied sense. ~

Further, though the presence of the Mississippi River may have been coincidental, in relation to that larger motion it seems then that it acted to encourage such a metaphoric manifestation through an association sort of interaction.

With its presence, it may have provided a stimulation of sorts - in support of that motion within that larger process which had already been conditioned through the popular structure of the bible. ~

For instance, if it were that there had been no river there, part of that emulation might not have folded again upon itself with that point of reference. ~

For example, from a sociological perspective in regard to the consistency I perceive - this would speculatively mean that within that series of motion beginning at the American Revolution for instance as representative of a manifestation of that divergence, that such conditioned structure continued to play out - even presenting a divergence itself, within those 13 colonies which could be likened to the initial presence of several political parties - then, upon the influence of geographical location of the Mississippi - then again found a conjunction of sorts which resulted in a layered effect then taking place within the off set of that larger motion.

If I were to research it more in depth, I believe I would find great coinciding/familiar motion of.resembling those depicted within that popular work - beyond (Westward) of the Mississippi. Those layers then playing out within the interaction of themselves, as well. ~

Such being represented (though speculatively) in the onset of the American Civil War for example. ~

Most notably within that example, is representation (though in the extreme) of that off set effect within that larger motion - being a shift in that divergence from an East/West regard, to a North/South. ~

Another attribute and substantiation to the idea of a layered effect, is that West of the Mississippi, there was far less effect from the more recent divergence (North/South) - being the Civil War than there was East of the river. Demonstrating the subtle distance between those layers and effect. ~

There is little possibility of such occurrences having been orchestrated as such in my opinion - again, especially early on in that seat of the pants aspect - though intentional and thought out series of developments.

There are far too many facets of such as emulation for them to have been purposefully orchestrated by any given individual as a conscious effort. Most especially when it is that the focus in the time period was entirely in other directions of effort, as can be accessed through even a simple review of history.

In my opinion, it is more so an indication of a much larger process of/in motion through out existence.

Similar social motion can be seen within the work titled the Bible as it was recorded and presented. In that observation I contend that such similarity - though subtle as per such motion and obviously of some relation (as described), is then relevant beyond a direct affiliation and comparison - being more indicative of a larger consistent inconsistency within the influences upon existence as they manifest - even having done so in the Biblical times as they were recorded.

To note further as perhaps a closer affiliation to such forms of influence as is/was the Bible. The book of Judges is proving to be very similar in content - social motion as described in a sort of linear consideration - as is the process of elected officials - more directly, as it eventually developed.

If such were a direct and conscious effort to directly emulate and embody something such as the Bible, there would have been no developmental aspect in such motions as pertaining to a relation between the book of Judges for instance, and the more topical aspects of elected office. Further, there would be far fewer similarities within those relations, with further areas of reference within the work called the Bible.

01/06/2007 In considering such similarities recently, and the apparent motion through out history of humanity within that larger influence, it gives me consideration within my studies, that consistently - humanity itself has come upon things far before humanity has been ready to address them.

The consistency of human developments as such is almost entirely undeniable when considered in such a manner.

As if even centuries must transpire between the time humanity discovers something, and the time where it is efficiently utilized - if even then only just begun to be understood.

Studies In Theology - 12/07/2006 (continued) - (The Importance Of Genocide? A House Divided? & Priests On The Hit List?)

2007-01-04T07:53:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/07/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/07/2006 (continued)

33:55 Is something most definitely to note pertaining to the interaction at this point, between the Israelites and the Lord.

It even resembles genocide as it is described, in intention - followed with a march or die sort of dictation in 33:56, which can only be seen as threatening at least. Warning that failure to vanquish all enemies in the land given them, would result in the Lord doing to the Israelites - what he had planned to do to their enemies. ~

To note- this then presents an understanding of perhaps the importance in becoming dominant in the area - removing in opportunity for a united sort of back lash against the obvious intention to conquer the area. That is to say, in a realistic sense - if they failed to vanquish every potential enemy, it could come back on them so to speak.

Chapter 34 describes boundaries for the Israelites to observe pertaining to their land. ~

In 34:13, it then indicates only 9 1/2 remaining tribes of Israel in the context of presented description when such is considered in an isolated manner. That is to say, when not considering the work in entirety - even on a literal basis.

It then for some reason, lists 10 tribes, which then indicates some number of populous required perhaps, to qualify as tribe - while then including this tribe aspect in consideration with the 1/2 tribe.

Manasseh is the only tribe at this point having been mentioned in regard to the indication of 1/2 - this being in reference to the land assigned East of the Jordan river. ~

It was only in chapter 26 that all 12 tribes were accounted for in the second census - listed as an entire body of the 12 (13) tribes. This being after the Acacia Grove incident with the plague. ~

In reviewing this most recent list of 9 1/2 remaining tribes in comparison with the second census, it is evident that these tribes choosing to be on the East side of the river, were not listed most previously - Being Reuben, Gad and 1/2 of Manasseh. ~

While it is that this is pertaining to land division on the West side of the river - it still indicates that split in a more pronounced manner.

Notably, now half of one tribe lives on either side of the river, which then presents another social change in dynamic. ~

Considering it, this then could be seen as a potential power position within the community of Israelites given the importance of communication and social dynamic - which then adds another aspect regarding social dynamic to the previously noted shift in general political structure - which has yet to transpire given that Moses is still rebelling from the Lord - and hasn't yet died (a bit of humor in that linear chronological perception). ~

This then means that within the larger social structure of the community of Israelites, that there are now 3 points of political leverage. Presenting a structure which could then be seen as;

Such a position could and probably did become more influential with time, given the obvious (as described) bounty of the land they chose - in regard to fortification and cultivation. ~

This is similar as well, to the structure of government we now refer to as representative democracy here in the United States (as I am currently exploring as a happenstance metaphor). ~

The potentials within this division to become inefficient and even destructive, are just as prominent given the differences which would most likely arise between the subtle, though different priorities in concerns between the division. One side, as stated, with obvious concerns for cultivation for instance at this point and the benefits of those greener pastures. ~

In 35:13, it is stated that the Levites are to be given 6 cities for refuge, with 3 of them on each side of the river. ~

This aside from the purposes presented as being for refuge, definitely indicates that the division did not go un-noticed. ~

In total, the Levites were to be given 48 towns - as previously noted: 6 of those were to be used for/as cities of refuge, where a person could flee to for safety. Described as being in relation to offenses such as accidentally killing someone. ~

In this, is another social progression - given that banishment was previously common in the sense of being cast out of the community entirely - where this demonstrates an effort in containing such, remaining within those pre-ordained cities, within the community of Israel.

(further even securing a form of containment reassuring less compromise of the consistencies even in situations pertaining to discrepancies within the community)

The way these cities of refuge are described seems to represent the beginnings of a judicial system of sorts, as well. given that those finding refuge, are to receive judgement and then must remain within the city until the death of the High Priest - where the person can then return to his/her land. ~

This presents an intriguing aspect to the symbolism of the High Priest - perhaps in accordance with those transference aspects associated with the anointing and the containment of sins. ~

The death of such a position (person in such position) perhaps indicating the passing of offense(s) as well in similar symbolism? ~

Such seems as though it could promote the early demise of High Priests in the case of prominent influence seeking to be absolved in such a manner. But that of course is in political extremes as example. ~

It definitely represents a larger importance and a different extended meaning to both the Levites and Priests at this point. Indicating further social development as well. ~

All considered within these developments, presents an interesting picture in regard to corresponding social interaction(s) as well as in regard to leadership position(s) - presumably soon to be occupied by Joshua. ~

The 6 cities must definitely be another pre-cursor - this example being in relation to what we now know to be, and have been - asylum, and of course - political asylum. ~

In 35:34 is another reference to the Lord having a physical presence and living among the people. ~

Chapter 36 again addresses women and property.

It as well addresses concerns with grants of land given women - and the transfer of it through inter-tribal marriage. Resulting in the decree and mandate to marry within the same ancestral tribe. - and that no grant of land may pass from one tribe to another! ~

This of course, in a modern sense - presents concerns of/with interbreeding, which, within this new structure socially, will be interesting to note (and explore) as it may develop. ~`

Studies In Theology - 12/07/2006 (Virgin Girls As Plunder? & A Nagging Efficiency In Communication?)

2006-12-31T10:48:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/07/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/07/2006

31:25 describes the plunder being taken in the destruction of the Midianites - in which was included human captives; virgin girls no less.

This all was divided according to the instructions presented, presumably.

Besides indicating the use of slavery at this point, it raises another question in my mind; What would priests do with virgin girls? ~ (I can imagine what I would do in that situation with virgin girls given the configuration of the tribes) ~

It is stated that Moses took 1 of every 50 prisoners and gave them to the Levites, 32 of the captives are said to have been given to the Lord via Eleazar the priest. ~

The human captives are counted just as the live stock are in this instance. ~

The generals then made additional offerings to the Tabernacle (the Lord) - through Moses and the priest. ~

It was said that this 'was done as a reminder to the 'Lord' that the people of Israel belong to him.' ~

This is a definite change in tone. it is almost as though such a statement infers that their actions were the Lords responsibility! ~

It further differs in that all previous sort of action(s), were to remind the people of that covenant. ~

It almost indicates a competition of reminding so to speak. The people of Israel doing things to remind the Lord - and conversely, the Lord instructing certain actions to remind the people of Israel. ~

This combined with the incessant guilt trip complaints about having been 'better off dead somewhere else' so to speak, then tends almost to liken itself in the imagination, to a nagging old couple - niether being one or the other, male or female in that respect. ~

Amusing thought, no less. ~

Chapter 32, Book Of Numbers describes another pronounced divergence within the Israelites. Reuben and Gad found land on the East side of the Jordan river which they wanted instead of that, with the others, on the West side.

Something else of note, is that those two tribes were previously assigned to the South of the Tabernacle. ~

This definitely indicates a social separation as well as progress away from nomadic tendencies - toward cultivation - in the reasoning being that concerning domestication of various sorts. Including fortification of towns for wives and children. ~

In 32:04, another noticeable difference occurs in the people of Israel, now being referred to as the community of Israel. ~

It continues to describe battles yet to be fought by the Israelites in the interest of procuring the land promised them, and it does so in sort of a third person reference pertaining to the Lord in statements such as the Lords battles, and the Lord has driven out his enemies - the Lord conquers the land so on, and the like. ~

Just as a note; it isn't until this haggling deal of sorts, that any reason is presented for battle and progress to be for the benefit of females particularly. That is to say, the reason(s) seem now divided pertaining to battle and progress, though still under the initial single point of focus in a larger social sense - being the Lord. ~

In 32:33, it describes entire kingdoms now being owned by the Israelites - the whole land and its cities as it states in one passage. ~

It then continues to state that towns were even built entirely, as well as some being re-built which were previously destroyed. Most definitely indicating a pronounced lack in nomadic aspects at this point. then further demonstrating perhaps the non-chronological/linear traits within this work at this point. ~

Chapter 33 is a written account of the places the Israelites camped after leaving Egypt. (41 separate moves if memory serves)~

In reviewing this written account of travel - it again piques my interest to compare the dates prescribed for noted ceremony and celebration of the Lunar calendar, with the modern calendar we use commonly within society. ~

Briefly it states that they set out from Ramsese in early spring - on the 15th day of the first month - after the first passover. ~

Immediately, as previously mentioned - this celebration could be likened to Mardi Gras (as previously mentioned) I believe. ~

Studies In Theology - 12/06/2006 (continued) (Vows, Divorce, Contradiction In Battle Leadership & Philosphy Of Religion?)

2006-12-30T10:37:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/06/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/06/2006 (continued)

Chapter 30 is in concerning vows.

Most judgement concerning vows is placed upon the men concerned - especially regarding females having made vows. it is presented here that the men can nullify or allow such vows to stand - unless she is widowed or divorced - then she must fulfill her vows - which seems odd considering the sort of vows being violated within the social action of divorce (presumably) - which I might say is another rather progressive social trait, for not only the time period - but the area as well. ~

This would seem then, in the context of this work (this version) - that marriage vows are set apart somewhat - perhaps something of their own consideration in a manner not commonly thought of pertaining to marriage vows? peculiar area for consideration which this seeming contradiction sets up.

If it is not to be seen as a contradiction, then there must be other purpose(s) it serves. If nothing else, it would indicate a wedding vow being somewhat different than a vow to the Lord. (Not to be confused with in the presence of the Lord, but only as per it being directed)~

Notably, this then further removes any possibility in those suggested mimicry's of the feminine element being seen as God - given the different level of concern obviously for vows to the Lord and wedding vows. ~

In chapter 31, much of it is dedicated to the description of finishing off the Midianites - and again states that after that, Moses will die! ~

Oddly, it was a priest chosen here to lead them in battle instead of Joshua (who was recently chosen to lead Israel) - which was one of Moses' specific requests in choosing a successor - being battle worthy. ~

It is said that they carried along the holy objects of the sanctuary into battle, and sounded the trumpets as well. ~

In the description of vengeful conquest - it is noted that the Israelites killed Balaam as well. specifically, with a sword. ~

Balaam is the guy who's donkey started talking to him - then further being the man that blessed the Israelites 3 times at great personal loss of wealth - now, further resulting in loss of his life as well. Even after presenting those blessings as per request of the Lord. ~

If memory serves, it was the angel on the road (3 times) that was going to kill Balaam to begin with as he reluctantly made the trip to cast 3 blessings upon Israel. ~

Again, perhaps that dichotomy? Further in relation with the Angel appearing as is becoming consistent?

Most definitely another inconsistency being suggested here - unless of course, killing Balaam was politically motivated? ~

The reasons presented here for doing so are stated to be that it was Balaam's advice that lead the Midianite women to cause the Israelites to rebel against the Lord. Inferring perhaps that his blessings where somehow connected to the sexual encounters and the feasting which resulted in plague. ~

It was then that only the virgins were spared of the Midianites. ~

In seeing such an action depicted brazenly - even seeming to be in a treacherous tone - I have to then give thought to the reasons why such depictions (and other odd inconsistencies) were left in this work (The Bible) over the centuries?

Especially in looking at modern efforts toward what is known as revisionist history with much else - and then further considering the degree to which similar efforts have occurred throughout history.

There must be a reason of some sort that such discrepancies have been left to be seen from generation to generation?

The chronological off sets - the inconsistencies. ~

It definitely shows some potential in reasoning pertaining to the points of contact aspect. ~

Further, this consistency of leaving such in the work - supports the idea of considering the work as a whole, as well. Then of course such coincides with the idea of points of contact as per variations of transference. ~

I found earlier, a thought pertaining to the difference between something such as the Bible - religious works - and philosophy (the idea of philosophy).

I realized that my own perspective sees a philosophical quality within religion (religion itself being classifiable as philosophy) - the Bible for instance - but this only becomes apparent when it is considered on the whole, perhaps even in an applied state on the whole.

The idea of the Bible for instance (most commonly) is that of worship - intended worship in that sense.

The idea of philosophy is human idea - perhaps even applied.

Within religion, there is symbolism and ceremony, which then begets a sort of social consistency. ~

Within the idea of philosophy, there is human realization, symbolism wrought from consideration beyond the consistencies of immediate ceremony and worship - though very much of (and as of influence) from the result(s) of religion in many cases. simply as a matter of human progress and conditioning. Especially very early on - and most notably (concerning recent studies of my own) within the 1700's area.

Though this influence is not direct in many cases - it is still there, simply as result of existence. ~

To apply religious text to one's life religiously is very much of religion and the idea of it. such is very much the social design of such structures as desired result. ~

To apply philosophical ideas in such a manner, is to remove even the idea of philosophy from itself in that sense, through relegating it to a religious like bent. ~

I have met with strange responses when approaching the idea that religion(s) are a form of philosophy (and conversely then - philosophy being no form of religion).

I realize now, my difference in perspective concerning such a comparison. ~

It would seem that religious text applied - produces a form of living, unspoken philosophy beyond its own perception.

Philosophy is the result of experience and insight (thought) resulting in something between observation and idea. ~

Pomething such as the bible for instance - could be considered a form of philosophy if considered on the whole - as result of the ideas proposed (and not of the applied ceremony per say) - but moves from such a potential in the application of specifics in the form of worship - ceremony for instance; applied, resulting ideology on the whole as opposed to applied literal action. Which, within considering the results of applied literal action through out a given social grouping (ceremonial consistency) then results in an observable philosophical element - though not necessarily within the rigid confines of the religious ceremony. ~ Perhaps an extended result of conditioning in so many words. ~

In regard to philosophy - it seems to have an inverted effect through attempts to apply it literally - that effect being similar in the more literal attempts at application, as within those areas of rigidity within religion.

In my opinion, such then renders less efficiency pertaining to the idea(s) presented. ~

The potentials within the approach to idea from idea, then being hindered in literal rigidity. the effect perhaps of resulting imposed limitations to which we tend as a species? ~

While such works in religion - I believe such an approach to philosophy forsakes it, if not transforms it into a mimicry of existing social structural dynamics. ~

12/30/2006 ; As a note it does present a rather precarious area of consideration between the two ideas of approach - though obviously on simple consideration, it is that they are of kindred cloth so to speak.

A person can approach the resulting effect of religion as idea. Areas of idea even in which to find further inspiration while such may not be readily observable within those rigid confines of ceremony.

It is possible to do so with and within the idea(s) of philosophy without the rigid ceremonies producing the other consistencies.

To approach the idea(s) of philosophy in a similar manner as to those of religion, then only relegates those potentials to a similar area of cognitive existence which then produces a distinction between approaches; that area within the idea(s) of applied literal meaning - which of course is imposed limitation - and that area resulting from idea(s) as and in existence.

Existing as a rigid re-application of literal interpretation(s) opposed to inhabiting existence as it were - of and as such ideas having been applied.

Studies In Theology - 12/06/2006 (Some Number Aspects And The Party Of All Parties?)

2006-12-29T12:16:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/06/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/06/2006

The Festival of Trumpets is instructed to take place in early Autumn, and then is followed with the Day Of Atonement which is said to have transpired 10 days later, on the 10th day of that month - which obviously isn't consistent given that 9 days later would be the 10th day of that month following the 1st. ~

I don't readily see anything particularly meaningful about this - beyond perhaps a slight difference in the approach to counting and enumerating, as described briefly in speculations put forward in regard to other seemingly (possible) divergence between then and our modern perspective -the ten number off set example perhaps being one of them. ~

Again, this occurs with the instruction of 5 days later on the 15th day - pertaining to yet another festival - The Festival Of Shelters - which is stated as being a 7 day festival.

Yet another reference to 7 and particularly notable within this appearance, given the relationships with the Day Of Atonement and the Year Of Jubilee - (seven sabbath years, seven sets of seven years).

Then as another particularly interesting point is the instruction within those instructions for the Jubilee, to blow the Rams horn.

Interesting given the nearness to the Festival Of Trumpets that this is placed. ~

This really must have been a heck of a time of year for the Israelites! It seems as rambunctious perhaps as is our modern Mardi Gras. ~

(Perhaps corroboration in regard to the exploration of modern food service and atonement? If, again, even simply as a matter of social development within the influences of such prominent and Popular imposed limitations as structure.)

(Further notes exploring modern food service and atonement as result of course through existence)

There is an extraordinary amount of ceremonial sacrifice which takes place within the festival. So much so that a person might tend to think that the Lord was insisting on depleting food supplies! Although, in considering the ceremonies and level of consumption of such sacrifices - it was more than likely an incredible celebration - a feast hard rivaled! ~

When a person first considers all of these sacrifices, in addition to what at first looks like a considerable amount daily, it appears to be no less than an extreme amount of sacrifice. That perspective is without considering the consumption aspects of much of those sacrifice examples.

From a certain perspective, such instruction could be as much in insuring no famine like occurrence would develop within the large body of people known as the Israelites. Further as use in stemming the aging stagnation of livestock. ~

In addition to grain and liquid offerings, there is a definite series of progression for each day of the festival pertaining to sacrifice.

On the first day of the festival;

13 young bulls
2 Rams
14 one year old male lambs

Are to be sacrificed.

This then progresses with one less bull each additional day until on the 7th day, there are;

7 young bulls
2 Rams
14 male lambs

This all accompanied each day with the sacrifice of one male goat as a sin offering. ~

In 29:35, the 7 day festival then seems to have 8 days purposefully - as it is instructed that on the 8th day of the festival, proclaim another holy day. ~

The sacrificial allotment for this 8th day of the 7 day Festival Of Shelters is consisting of grain and liquid offerings in addition to;

1 young bull
1 ram
7 one year old male lambs

This of course followed with the sin offering of one male goat. ~

The 13 has thus far been most affiliated with the total number of tribes of Israel, and is at least interesting to see it in affiliation (initial number of bulls as sacrifice in this festival) with sacrificial offerings. Perhaps being an extension in transference of that tendency to associate the priests with a form of sustenance previously explored?

Further then, perhaps associating all 13 tribes with a form of sustenance for the Lord?

The appearance of 14 in such a consistency is somewhat of a new thing at this point.

Then as pronounced is the number of lambs being reduced from 14, to 7 on that 8th day. ~

In Leviticus 23, these festivals are mentioned with instruction to observe them, but it isn't until the 28th and 29th book of numbers that the sacrificial allotment is instructed for the festivals. ~

Again is a continuity aspect a person may see as inconsistency - but again is the folding aspect which becomes potential in addition to that seemingly re-occurring progression. ~

As a rather entertaining speculation; combining the chapter numbers between the chapter in Leviticus (being 23) and each respectively within Numbers at this point (being 28 and 29) - it yields respectively; 51 and 52 - for a total of 103.

When each then is totaled of itself, it then results in 6 (51) and 7 (52) - which, as touched on before, are rather prominent and re-occurring numbers thus far, symbolically - particularly to the as of yet implemented Star Of David.

Further I might add, the sum of 103, is obviously 4 - Numbers is the 4th book of 66 constituting the Bible. ~

Perhaps such may be of interest in the future should I choose to further explore it, and/in conjunction with those folding points of contact presented as speculation earlier in this body of notes? ~

Just as a giggle, in addition to the 6 and 7 result - when combined, those then sum 13 - which further combined, obviously is 4, yet again. ~

Studies In Theology - 12/05/2006 (continued) (Chicks With Their Own Stuff, Good And Evil?)

2006-12-27T10:37:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/05/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/05/2006 (continued)

Chapter 26 (Numbers) begins as yet another census - though this time results in instruction to now divide the land they presently occupied (Moab) among the tribes of Israel accordingly except of course, for the Levites as described previously. ~

This would suggest that where they divided this land was the previously promised land, but that presumption then raises some question given that Moses is/was still among them - and even more in the statement of not one on the list of census had been on the previous list of census because the lord said they will die in the wilderness.

This even seems to promote the assumption that it was the promised land, while not stating it to be the promised land. ~

With the presence of Moses, it is most surely not within my opinion given the previous statement that neither Aaron nor Moses would be admitted to the promised land. ~

This then displays a divergence within the body of Israel.

Caleb and Joshua were sent into the previously described beautiful land while the other Israelites continued to wander (and complain in a rather pronounced fashion) - but nothing more has been stated pertaining to Joshua and Caleb except that they had survived as had been stated. ~

Chapter 27 begins with an incredibly progressive subject matter and decision in a social sense - especially for the time period. ~

It describes a petition brought by the daughters of a tribesmen that would have been due an allotment of land, wanting that allotment for themselves.

The claim for the allotment was deemed legitimate by the Lord, then further set standards for inheritance of worldly possessions - including the females in the event that no son was rightful heir. ~

From what little I know about common standards of the time, and even of the area (even today) - this is incredibly ground breaking. Even in respect to most western culture (and even eastern for that matter).

It was (and may still be in that area) un-heard of for a female to possess things of that nature. ~

It is further an incredible comparison in regard to social progress in many parts of the world - including, comparatively, the United States - having been in the fore front of Western cultures embracing the idea of females pertaining to just about everything - beyond bare foot and pregnant. ~

It further supports the idea of the Living Metaphor I have begun to explore - being the United States. ~

Curious thing that many countries, even in the general vicinity of modern Israel are still rather hard lined pertaining to such - even many European countries (pertaining to modernalities) were slow to the up-take of such revisions socially.

Rather an interesting surprise given the popularity of modern Christianity.

The contrast definitely reflects the relationship between the United States and Israel in that respect (politically speaking in a supposed manner), even though such things are not as pronounced elsewhere - including modern Israel I presume - given its location geographically. ~

In 27:12, there appears a contradiction to that which was previously described pertaining to Joshua - it would appear - given that Joshua is chosen here as a new leader for Israel - that he did not go into the previous bountiful land as described (as having been suggested). ~

It is again stated in 27:13, that Moses and Aaron were brothers - which then gives me more thought in regard to the depiction of Moses in his youth - and further in the direction of purposeful motives beyond a slave girl providing a better life for her child (Moses), perhaps? ~

It is at this point that Moses receives instructions to climb a mountain and die - but only after transferring the leadership to Joshua through ceremony - further accompanied with instructions to transfer some of Moses' authority to him so he will be obeyed by all of Israel.

This after stating that Joshua has the spirit in him. ~

In a political sense at this point - things diverge to some degree in instructing that when Joshua needs direction from the Lord,I he is to inquire of it from the priest, Eleazar - who will gain it through divination of casting lots.

Sacred lots at that, to determine the Lords will; This is how Joshua and the rest of the community (Israel) will determine everything they do. ~

There is a definite division of power(s) in this action and new standard - surprisingly being similar to previous means and other forms of worship in other structures. But further it signifies a political power division.

Israel is to obey Joshua, but the priest now interprets Gods will.

Deeper within this division is the leanings of the Levites toward the priesthood, while Joshua has no such affiliation being from another tribe. ~

A beginning point between church and state discrepancies and rivalry?

It also represents a distance of separation in a generational sense pertaining to Israel as well, with the transfer and the passing of the previous relationships between the two distinct positions - perhaps a point which fueled political interactions in ways not yet seen within the civilizations of the day - Deity was now a single point of focus within this structure - and presumably - (symbolically) King - and leadership (the body of populous) was an individual meant to be obeyed, who was to directly respond to the divination in such decisions. ~

The person who would have been seen as a King in such a role within other civilizations - was only a leader to be obeyed in similar manners as a king - without the title of such necessarily. ~

Further distance within this new configuration - is very much in that change where interpretation falls entirely to the priest - given that previously it was through Moses that much of the instructions came - the church (Tabernacle), at that point was a place of ceremony to the deity - where now it was to be a more contained and isolated - almost exclusively to certain people (political interests) source of information. ~

Further, within this specific area of transformation, is the aspect of no longer being nomadic, as before. Indicating further, and most definitely a social change in dynamic and motion. ~

In chapter 28, further evidence of change exists in the instructions for offerings now being depicted as to occur at appointed times instead of the previous standard as per offense/atonement and of course in observation of celebrations and ceremonies. ~

The offerings are to be presented daily at this point. ~

Chapter 29 begins with directions pertaining to the Festival of Trumpets - which was established in conjunction with the introduction of the trumpets as previously described. ~

It is very much a celebration, as depicted - in use of the trumpets to make music for the people of Israel. ~

This is another place where it is no less than interesting to consider the relationship between God and Lucifer - given that Lucifer is said to have been the Angel in charge of music. ~

Where is it then, that the split between God and the Devil (Lucifer) transpired? ~

Is such a festival then to be seen as Devils due? Is it before that split? ~

Perhaps as I have put forward in regard to other areas within existence - existence itself is an emulation of something larger?

The more present split within the concentrated social structure described previously as being in relation to that larger split said to have happened between God and Lucifer? That itself perhaps representing something else? ~

Which area then, within that social structure now depicted within this work, is to be seen as more affiliated with either idea within such understanding? God - Lucifer? -

Is it that it is more an amalgamation?

A process in motion? ~

In our physical realm it is arguable that there is not one without the other. ~

Can one be seen as only a given thing as well as the other? ~

Is it that both ideas are only to be recognized personally - which would be all that anyone could really do in our physical realm? ~

That which is catagorizable as evil in traditional and strict (even not so strict) senses within our realm, are very much part of our everyday lives. ~

Such thought then leads me again to the realization of our choice in existence as/is very much up to ourselve(s) as societies. Most especially in those societies where it is that the potentials to embrace that dichotomy are by design - to produce a heaven on earth or a living hell at our own hands - and even more so when considering the concept of Christ within the context of religion (as per Popular Christianity especially). ~

This line of consideration then, makes the importance of driving every evil from our midst as a society, not only somewhat impossible - but less efficient even if it is that the potentials of producing a more livable society are squandered - in some instances even - in the supposed interest of combating evils. ~

Not only to waste the path to efficiently removing evils with the extraneous efforts to do so - but actually promoting the (similar) results upon society in effect - as if evil reigned entirely within those ideas. ~

is such then producing good for the residence of evil? ~

productivity only to feed the void of desperation within concentrated forms of that which may be derived as one or the other? Good displacing evil in healthy progress and evil devouring the productivity of good? ~

A paradox of itself. ~

Doesn't such actually then put the good fight in utilizing - embracing that which is - in the better interest of contributing to that potential of heaven on Earth? Recognizing elements within existence which detract from that potential as perhaps not evil, but a precursor - though perhaps pro-active of potential evil. ~

Unless, I suppose our result of good is supposed to result in what would eventually be un-livable conditions. ~

Which then is the better path?

To promote those potentials while sustaining a livable society with directions toward conducive atmospheres?

Hard lined removal of everything deemed evil in opinion (most times tainted with political bent) to the degree of total destruction in the interest only to then attempt existence again - surrounded by that which will only be called good somehow? Amidst and from within the rubble wrought from efforts to destroy evil - now easily being seen as the product of such, itself? Not to mention the classification of/in the reasoning's and effort to do so? ~

I can recall a statement from a distant acquaintance I once had, that was something to the order of; Sometimes the okay stuff gets mixed in... - and I can only see where perhaps he was referring to such concerted efforts - regardless of what precisely he was referring to.

Such could then be seen as an evil within such efforts - not only then producing more evil, but even detracting from the proposed good as well with and of such designs in effort - regardless of political alignment and reasons/justifications to do so. ~

Odd that one topical society is based much on promoting the doing away with some perceived evil - even in extremes - with concerted efforts in all sorts of imaginable designs - but always, it seems, within the confines of that process which begets as much ill, as it is said to remove. Especially while being surrounded with many things once thought of as evil themselves - if not then utilizing such in everyday life - somehow no longer seen as such extreme. ~

Much of our society depends upon good and bad classifications - when in observable truth, no such separation actually exists within those extremes. ~

some even attempt to drive such ideas, through promoting the need for one or the other, but it doesn't seem as though there will be a shortage of either, anytime soon. ~

Interesting potentials for inversions with such a dynamic and paradox. ~

Supposed good having the potentials of evil in its motion and action - Supposed evil having the potentials of good in a similar respect (quality of life through technology, for instance - tools used to combat evil). ~

Enough thought in writing for this evening.

Studies In Theology - 12/05/2006 (Deadly Coodies, infiltration And The Potential Affiliation Of Human Sacrifice As Atonement?)

2006-12-27T08:09:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/05/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/05/2006

Chapter 25 again show incredibly severe punishment for what is described as sexual relations with Moabite women - though the punishment is applied for having feated and worshiped with them of false idols - being the Gods of Moab. ~

This brought the execution of the ring leaders supposedly, as well as a display from a grandson of Aaron (Phinehas) in pursuing an Israelite still with one of the women and thrust a spear through him into the woman as well. ~

This supposedly stopped yet another plague, but only after having killed 24,000 Israelites. ~

This is somewhat unique thusfar in a priest killing other people - having been described only as participating in sacrificial ceremonies to this point. ~

It definitely signifies a threshold having been crossed.

There was no ceremony to the emotionally charged execution of the man and woman - but is further described as being rewarded by the Lord for turning the Lords anger away from the people (Israelites).

This done for; Being as zealous among them as I was. ~

Suggesting - alluding to having had a physical presence in the past at this point. further perhaps suggesting of an embodiment within Aaron - even suggesting the present transcendental form - to be that of Aaron, through mentioning Aaron immediately previous to the statement regarding the state of former presence. ~

There is definitely an aspect of the movement of such embodiment here - which then is made all the more interesting in the recent reference to God being King of the Israelites. Then being more intriguing in the respect of that King now being referred to in a past tense physically, though obviously somehow present in the voicing of such statements. ~

This zeal shown by Phinehas was rewarded - and I have to chuckle some here, as the reward was in the form of a special covenant of which he was already a part - being that he and his descendants were already guaranteed a permanent right to the priest hood (sans of course some ailment). ~

What then is really being said about such action? ~

In 25:13, it then even refers to the killing as an act which purified the people of Israel - making them right with God. ~

Obviously this definitely associates the killing of the man and woman with not only a sacrificial offering as atonement, but then with priestly actions as well. This definitely then presents various shifts in symbolism as well as potential transference. Most definitely potential deviation through association at this point, especially when considering the various forms of other mimicry's which are quite present now, in the modern day. ~

As a note; the man (Israelite) killed - was from (the leader of no less) the tribe of Simeon. Previously noted as having been cursed for brutality by Jacob. Perhaps, as I read from 25:16 - it is that Simeon is becoming somewhat of a scapegoat in this example? ~

In 25:16 there is insight into the association and activity at Acacia Grove perhaps having political leanings - as it is stated that the Israelite leader (The Simeon), was coupled with the daughter of the Midianite leader. Which gives a different impression than some orgy like chaos.

More to the side of purposeful intention in such relations for which ever reason.

This is substantiated to some degree in stating the reason of the attack on the Midianites being that they assaulted with deceit and trickery! Definitely indicative of deeper political reasons given that the Israelites must have known of the form of worship of the Midianites before entering into such orchestrated relations with them which would have paired tribe leader with comparable social status in said relationship and exchange. ~

This being very much a possibility as the Moabites (Midianites presumably) are described as local to the place that they (the Israelites) camped - being the Acacia Grove. ~

In a larger social sense, it could be likened much as was described in 22:04 of Numbers - describing the destructive potential of the Israelites as a mob devouring everything in sight. ~

In regard to yet another example of plague - with the consistency of the plague as it is depicted, it gives me thought toward - yet again - the subtle differences perhaps between different civilizations in that area (at the time depicted).

In a similar respect, though not in the same extremes - interaction between different civilizations - and different elemental consistencies - may have made for variations of the plagues as they manifested.

Different people having different - though slight at this point - immunities and tolerances. ~

Something such as the large scale social exchanges (feasting - sexual) depicted in chapter 25, could very well have been enough to breech those subtle differences, and transmitting - even exciting - various strains being dormant (perhaps no longer even communicable in the air borne sense) until such opportunities arose?

With what is now known of such viruses - such stands to reason, especially in regard to the obvious manipulation of that larger influence depicted thus far. Perhaps the concentration in that single point of focus - then resulted in a physiological shift as well? ~

Something further to consider here is within that level of tolerance - perhaps a developed immunity through the larger scale (variations) of exposure within the nomadic aspects of the Israelites? Especially in the building of resistance and immunity to various strains as they were exposed to them - then of course transferring them to others not yet with the same tolerance? ~

Something yet further to note as previously touched on, is the difference in the idea of civilization(s) from our current perspective. We now regard such as a whole in civilization within the shrinking effect of growing population and modern communications (among other things) - where at the time of this depiction, such was definitely not the case.

Studies In Theology - 12/04/2006 (Lion And Lioness - Metamorphosis, Curses, Blessings And God Being The King Of Israel?)

2006-12-20T08:19:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/04/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/04/2006

As chapter 23 begins, again is the number 7 in a prominent use; To build seven altars, seven young bulls and seven young rams. ~

It is then stated that the two of them (bulls and rams) are sacrificed one each per altar as burnt offerings. ~

Another oddity appears in 23:03 with it being stated that Balaam goes to a hill and is met by the Lord where Balaam states: I have prepared seven altars..... ~

This is odd in that he bade the King to prepare the altars. ~

He then returns with the message which is blessing instead of curse on Israel - referring to Israel as Jacob even - in 23:07 - which at least suggests a deeper relationship than is topically discernible given the length of time (presumably) since the reference to Jacob as Israel initially. ~

From another point of perspective - this might be more as result of that continuity illusion within the most common chronological perceptions of this work - meaning that perhaps somehow this occurrence is more in the time period nearer Jacobs generation than presently suggested? ~

It at least suggests a presence of information and knowledge far greater than is depicted given such a reference through Balaam - presumably somewhat of a stranger to the Israelites but obviously familiar with their concept of god. ~

As a note pertaining to this interesting relation - in chapter 20, verse 15 - it states that the Israelites had ancestors that went down to Egypt and were then enslaved. This of course was before (is in reference to) they were enslaved in Egypt for some 500+(?) years - if immediate memory serves. ~

Given that Balaam is obviously not Israelite and more especially that he is in residence somewhere North of Egypt - and then given the reference to a similar form of worship as is the single point of focus, then further that Moses (having been raised as an Egyptian) then returned from banishment/exile/escape(?) from a presumed northerly direction - as well as the familial history of Joseph - it then eludes to deeper relationships beyond the Israelites, with the Israelites being a sort of figure head within this rather popular work. ~

It is widely known of a cousin sort of relationship with Christianity and other mid-East faiths - but that is not this line of thought.

This is more in exploring the suggested extension which this tends to depict the Israelites as. ~

Why then out of all of the people presumably of a form of single entity religious structure - were the Israelites said to be a special sort? The newer version, to say the least - of a larger type of worship. Unique most definitely (to my knowledge) within that nomadic aspect (as well as other particulars; commerce, liberal bents) - but how nomadic was it in having had rules for trade (in business) and rules pertaining to agriculture?

Does the presence of such indicate that serogate aspect mentioned previously? ~

Perhaps, in considering this - it could be seen that the nomadic aspect coupled with the various dictation, could have been in the interest of a naturalization aspect, itself? An effort toward familiarization and conditioning to standards of those other - obvious - single entity civilizations? ~

The king then asks that they go to another place and look upon the Israelites (presumably being quite numerous at this point - a horde no less, I could imagine) and perhaps curse at least as many as could be seen - then again, seven more altars and similar sacrifice (which is depicted very much in that repetition form) - and again Balaam meets the Lord - Returning, the King actually asks; What did the 'Lord' say? Which further indicates a previous familiarity with such a form of worship - substantiated with King Balak actually having known that Balaam would say only the message that god puts in his mouth. ~

In every respect, Balak seems to have known of this religious structure. ~

Again, there is a reference to the Israelites as Jacob with the blessing that Balaam delivers (23:21) - while simultaneously referring to Israel as well - then stating that god has been proclaimed their KING (which very much substantiates previous explorations) - it seems to suggest an inverted use of such a proclamation as well, in that anyone proclaimed (proclaiming) to be King of Israel - is then likened to god for what ever purpose.

This gains interest in regard to Christ being mocked as King of the Jews (at a later point) - which then adds more interest into the symbolism(s) and transference of previously explored relations as per Jacob, Israel, Christ. ~

In another thought pertaining to Jacob/Israel and the nomadic tendency described, as well as that which befell them - using similar lines of reasoning within the idea of transference - those years could be likened to the discomposure process in having been compared (as a body of people) to the person known as Jacob/Israel. ~

I happen upon that rather abstract perspective in considering 23:23. 'No curse can touch Jacob, no magic has any power against Israel.' ~

"Of course no curse can touch Jacob" was my thought - "at this point, he (personally) was long dead."

I then considered the obvious relation implied within those two lines and realized that perhaps such a relation in transference as a metaphor, extended farther? ~

In 23:24, it is eluded to that Israel is like a lioness and a lion - which now actually refers to Israel in a feminine sense, though coupled with the masculine of the same - perhaps suggesting a duality within the meaning of the presented body as it were?

Then even stating that within that state, they even drink the blood of the slaughtered! ~

(While this is rather foreboding in the propaganda sense, it is notable that such is actually a direct violation against the decree of Moses, Aaron and God in forbidding the consumption of blood)

Could the symbolic, ceremony consistencies actually have acted to produce a result through the tendencies of people - which then preceded them in myth as and with such prowess? ~

The consistencies within the ceremonies of worship and offerings, had much to do with the use of blood as is readily observable - even in anointing their priest. ~

Again in 23:29, it is that seven more altars are built, and the same sacrifice took place. ~

After this sacrifice, it is said that Balaam realized the Lord was determined to bless Israel, so he did not resort to divination as before. ~

It is then said that the spirit of god came upon him and he again delivers a blessing - again referring to Jacob and Israel, this example even complimenting their tents and homes, respectively. ~

In reviewing the tribes at this point, it is rather intriguing that the reference to lion and lioness is used - given that in Genesis 49:09, Judah is referred to in a similar manner, though as a lion he crouches down after eating its prey. ~

Most definitely a familiarity beyond some topical relationship here. Perhaps even depicting a metamorphosis of sorts, in a symbolic sense. From one version of existence, to another.

Something else I find now in review of Genesis 49, is in Jacob cursing Simeon and Levi for murderous and malicious leanings - 'to be scattered among the descendants of Jacob' (speaking of himself presumably in third person). ~

As it results thus far in the Bible, Simeons tribe of descendants is listed second in the census and leads the procession in travel - while the Levites have gained (have been appointed) a rather trusted and important post as is obvious - even extended a secret sort of status in being left out of the census, though empowered to some degree - even as dealers of justice. ~

Strange results thus far for a curse from Jacob. ~

The curse suggests that Jacob was wanting of a peaceful and productive Nation, where the result thus far has been in not regarding that curse, but perhaps utilizing the perceived tendencies in both the most forward position in travel, and as a sort of security for the Tabernacle. ~

24:17 suggests perhaps a prediction of Christ - but further may suggest a more in depth plan of sorts pertaining to the descendants of Jacob - known as the tribes of Israel. ~

It is hard to believe that a traveling horde comprised of several divisions, would be those which could put forward such potential designs - which then suggests further the serogate aspect - but more in depth perhaps with something in mind beyond immediate perception. ~

As it stands in the modern day, even these early depictions of a newer version of a religious structure, can be seen echoing in several different layers and effect. Even some rather transparent emulations seemingly in some effort to gain acceptance within some of the larger extremes of the more consistent continuance, otherwise. ~

Studies In Theology - 12/02/2006 (A Bronze Snake, A Talking Donkey And Evidence Of Supernatural Political Discord)

2006-12-19T07:31:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/02/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/02/2006

Chapter 21 in the book of Numbers describes victory over the Canaanites! ~

It is said that as the Israelites traveled, they were attacked by Canaanites and some were taken prisoner. ~

It then states their pleading with the Lord and presenting a deal of sorts, in exchange for victory over them - being that they would destroy all of their towns if they were given victory over the Canaanites. ~

They then proceeded to destroy all of the towns presumably of the Canaanites. ~

The footnote describes this as referring to the complete consecration of them, to the Lord, either through destroying them or presenting them as offering. ~

To be consecrated through being destroyed? Definitely more depth to explore within this symbolism and meaning. ~

Further then is the aspect of human sacrifice within this symbolism and current example. It suggests that anything could be sacrificed, as long as it was in the interest of consecration. ~

How similar is this to various occult activities? The act of destroying human life (among other things) in the interest of consecration - in the interest, in so many words, of becoming one with even such an idea as is god. ~

Again, it isn't difficult to see certain aspects of a duality perhaps. Further then, aspects of that multiple within a single point of reference. ~

Other cultures of the time, practiced human sacrifice regularly - many even spent human life in sport - demonstrating a level of brutality which cannot be labelled as callous given that it has been within human development and social progress, that such normality was discontinued - changed as it were. ~

Those things definitely indicated a much different level of human cognitive thought in that time period. Animal-like in regard to very few seeing such as cruel - most likely only ever being opposed in reasoning with the likes of basic fear. It was simply the way things transpired. ~

Kind of odd.. and even an oxymoron, that even the idea of recognizing something as cruel - seems to have stemmed from the concept of Christianity as well.

Again presenting another facet of the dual aspects within the progression of it - built upon the blood of countless numbers, much in similar manners as many other cultural aspects within various civilizations of the time period - but from it (and from the result of the conflict(s) within it) producing much of what we now know to be humanitarianism. The realization of even ideas we have titled with names such as cruelty and even kindness.

Then simultaneously within this dynamic and as result of human tendency, many times seeking ways around such ideas as they may be in relation to how one person sees another - but somehow never being acceptable to ones self being without the benefit of such developed (safeties) recognized perceptions. ~

In fact, our modern civilization has even produced the use of such standards in human perception, to then perpetuate a pronounced lack in recognition of it upon others - in a series of efforts.

The use of the idea of something else being cruel - so cruel as to then justify actions seemingly beyond the established idea (in standard) of cruelty itself. ~

Human development; in that sense - looks to be a rather curious thing to say the least. ~

In 21:04 it depicts more complaints from the people of Israel and subsequently more punishment in the manner of being beset with poisonous snakes. ~

Then again, apparent contrition which gains a prayer from Moses to the Lord - then further gaining instructions to fashion a bronze snake for anyone bitten to look upon and be healed. ~

Here is actual instruction from the Lord to fashion an effigy - this in the interest of countering the effect of having sent the snakes. ~

It presents as well, another point of focus besides the Tabernacle, to be established in the physical realm for the purpose of interaction (connection) with something of another (realm) - in the effort and interest of effecting physical results within the physical realm. ~

Further another example in the use of transference to effectively lift the otherwise normal result of venomous snake bite. Interceding between the venom and the physical result to the person. ~

Presuming such is the case (and process) as per example - where then is it that the initial resulting effect(s) are transferred to? could it be collected in that sense, then to be wielded?

The sins of people were placed within Aarons medallion - how un-heard of is it then, to apply the same line of thought with the bronze snake and that which it presumably acted to impede (being the effect of the venom)? ~

21:10 then tells of travels that again contradict the cultivation aspects described earlier - as is demonstrated in much of the complaining - at least such would seem to be the case, though their travels look as though they could be patterned in some degree - mentioning again, places already having been or near to. (There are 41 moves recorded of the tribes of Israel while in the wilderness)

21:21 depicts defeating a king and occupying his land, then utilizing the new found fortification to capture a near by kingdom as well. ~

In chapter 22, it states that the Israelites again traveled - A person has to consider that having captured and occupied two kingdoms would imply that it was no longer all of the Israelites that were traveling. Especially in considering the efforts in rebuilding that which was destroyed when conquering. ~

Even upon approaching another kingdom in the recent travels, they (the Israelites) are referred to as being from Egypt - even after it being acknowledged that the present king recognized the previous victories of the Israelites. ~

The present king then sends messengers to summon someone to curse the Israelites - A person that is depicted as having a relationship with God as well. God first telling him to refuse and that the Israelites are blessed. ~

A second request for the individuals presence for said purpose received an explanation that he was powerless against the will of god having instructed him to refuse previously - but now proposing that the messengers stay another night, that god may have something else to say. ~

Both instances that Balaam refers to god are associated with a communication at night. Moses and the Israelites commonly refer to such interaction in day time - though non-exclusively. It even being stated that none in the camp receive visions because of the status of Moses and Aaron (previously). ~

As stated, god then speaks to Balaam that night, and instructs him to go with the messengers (of a stately variety) - but only to do what the Lord tells him to do. ~

Almost immediately following this in 22:22 - it is said that god was now angry that Balaam was going with them and sent an Angel of the Lord to block the road. An Angel which Balaams donkey saw himself and bolted off of the road.

Then further, the Angel blocked the way so the donkey just laid down - all three instances Balaam responded with beating his donkey. ~

At this last example, it is said that the Lord gave the donkey the ability to speak, with which it immediately asked about the three beatings. ~

instead of being amazed that his donkey could suddenly talk - Balaam began a conversation with it in direct response to the posed question about beatings. ~

After a few exchanges in this conversation, Balaam again saw the Angel who inquired about the beatings and further stated his intention to kill Balaam for having stubbornly resisted his efforts to block the way - which of course Balaam concedes and offers to return home. ~

Again is a multiple aspect here in the Angel somehow superseding the previous command of the Lord to make the trip - and further in the suggestion of blocking his way to comply with the Lord. ~

The Angel then states that Balaam should continue his trip - but now he is only to say what the Angel wants him to say - then in 22:38, the Angel is referred to as God in stating that he (Balaam) could only say the words that God placed in his mouth. ~

Again, with the introduction of an angel making such statements, there is plausible cause to consider no less than at least a multiple aspect similar to that I have explored - and further, possible evidence that rebellion which was/is said to have transpired in heaven between God and Lucifer.

Both extremes most definitely having Angels. Both extremes (as represented in God and Devil), as is widely known - caught up in a power struggle which can be seen in various instances through out human history.

Studies In Theology - 12/01/2006 (Moses Speaks To A Rock With A Big Stick!)

2006-12-18T09:14:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 12/01/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

12/01/2006

Chapter 20 describes more travel and arrival in the wilderness of Zin- Having no water available in the area, Moses was instructed to speak to a rock and it would flow with water - this after another round of complaints and rebellion. ~

It then states that Moses did as he was told though later is said to not be allowed to lead Israel into the land promised them, because he supposedly failed to demonstrate the lords holiness. ~

I have to wonder if this is in reference to Moses striking the rock twice with his staff as opposed to speaking to it?

Perhaps it was due to the attempt of looking as though it were he and Aaron that created water from the rock - as opposed to crediting the lord? ~

In 20:14, Moses states in a message to a local king, that an angel lead the Hebrews out of Egypt. Which then makes a person wonder if he was likening himself to an angel?

Perhaps there was some un-mentioned influence (other than the lord) - perhaps again is the idea of angel representing the presence of god? ~

Here, Israel was forced to turn around at the threat of the king of Edom and his army. ~

It then goes on to describe Aarons death - which contains some interesting aspects which are rather civilized given the time period. ~

It depicts Aaron giving his son his priestly garments (Moses being the presenter of them) and then dieing on the top of a mountain. It obviously symbolises a succession of the sort which is/was rather common in other civilizations. ~

As I write that word in reference to that time period - it strikes me as interesting when considering that then, it very much was "civilizations" - in our modern day, most is referred to as civilization. Even given the differences between various cultures. ~

This further demonstrates the motion of that larger process - even within the reasoning of modernization as understanding. This further than the shrinking aspect of perspective and perception demonstrated in such an example. ~

When considered beyond that effect on human understanding and perception, it demonstrates (though in a large result) - the resulting effect of that larger process.

What used to be considered separate civilizations independently - are now widely considered separate cultures as part of a larger body. Then further, placing the idea of representative democracy in its own light. ~

12/18/2006 As a note in tangent - while sitting and pondering the various aspects I have recently explored pertaining to representative democracy itself, and of course the manner in which it has manifested and continues - I notice a rather comical consistency... though it really isn't all that funny beyond the comical aspects of it, if you can understand that.

Given what anyone can research about even recent history - for instance, the consistent levels of corruption which have been brought to light and some of which have just been chided at through a lack in effort to bring them to light; There is no way to find any information pertaining to current forms of corruption. There is no way to investigate for ones self... to view the situation(s) which currently reside in positions of power. Within this, is then the prevailing attitude that such forms of corruption have never existed, much less could possibly be present in which ever current governing body happens to be in effect.

This audacity, even in the consistency which anyone can research. This definitely maintains until far after the violations and presumably the terms served, until ANYONE will even begin to address what may or may not have been otherwise flagrant transgressions in the forms of abusive corruptions. It doesn't seem to matter which political side a person may be on... it simply is as though it just cannot be approached in the current term(s). As if it is some fraternal, un-spoken rule.

It is very much its own punch line, as this cycle then is continued with the next term and power shift (if any) and so on and so forth... only looking to sometimes really grotesque violations long after the fact in the effort to appear to gain some leverage in political competitions. Then of course, within the ease of modern day communications it would be rather easy to simply manufacture the sort of insurance which would keep anyone from addressing current violations immediately - if even only gossip to gum up the gears so to speak.

Either way, it is a rather funny social occurrence to witness time and again, sometimes even the very same people over and over, step up as if the previous (and very long line of consistent corruptions) did not exist... much less in the current moment. Not even potentially within the current moment, is usually the posturing.

It is truly amazing when you think about it.

I would imagine that in the more rudimentary progression of that... that it eventually just becomes a decision making process of splitting up what ever can be procured in that go around and then of course, dishing it off to some pre-selected scapegoat. I would imagine within the consistency of it, that the scapegoat(s) may even opt to be the scapegoat(s) in some social hierarchical procession. But then, I suppose that poses the problem of convincing everyone else outside of those relationships, that the chosen scapegoat(s) is sufficient regardless of the effecting ramifications on the rest of society. I would imagine that it just becomes that mundane and everyday sort of thing. Rather entertaining.

Studies In Theology - 11/30/2006 (continued) (Fast Food, Rentals & Holy Water Which Can Defile?)

2006-12-17T11:54:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/30/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/30/2006 (continued)

In 18:20, I am nearly set aback with realizations in regard to developments we live within currently, having remarkable similarities with those earlier developed rules - if even only from the level of saturation of/from Christianity itself - through out western culture. ~

Instead of an allotment of land for Aaron and his line - priests (including the Levites), they will be compensated with a portion of the tithe collected from the Israelites (tithe representing 10% at the time).

This suggests to me the beginnings of both welfare and rentals as we know them in the modern day. ~

I hesitate to say that I see everyone on welfare and renting housing in the modern day - to be of Aaron, or priest like - but I would say that it is probable that such social consistencies and developments could have some relation. Especially given that the entire tribe of Levites were to receive no allotment of land, either. ~

Something further of interest is the permission to eat of the offerings, anywhere you wish pertaining to the Levites and their families. ~

Again perhaps a distant relation - perhaps a reason for need of - what we now see as modern restaurants and Inns. This along with the need to accommodate earlier holy day celebrations as well.

It strikes a personal chord in memories from youth of setting an extra plate at the table on occasion - mores so, a place setting. ~

It is at this point (chapter 18) where the Tabernacle itself becomes off limits to any except the priests, Levites and Moses presumably. ~

Chapter 19 describes the ceremony in preparing ash of a red heifer to use in the water for a purification ceremony - it must be burned with some cedar (or juniper), hyssop and scarlet yarn - which again likens to casting of spells previously, within earlier societies and forms of worship (now casting lots within the tribes of Israel?).

I am curious with reading the instructions for handling this preparation ceremony being that anyone involved with preparing the ash to be used to purify - is then seen as unclean until evening.

Rather a strange thing in preparing that to be used to purify those finding themselves in a state of defilement. ~

This being stated as in regard to someone dieing inside of a tent as well as being defiled in the presence of a dead body, even a persons bones or a grave. ~

There is an emphasis on using the ash in water with hyssop used to sprinkle it on the third and seventh day. ~

If the water is not sprinkled on them, they are said to remain defiled - but again, in some twist, anyone touching the water will become defiled until evening.

Again, a transference of some sort in using the heifer ash - but with a two way exchange of sorts in it as well, being of a dead creature? ~

To note yet again similarities - this could be more foreshadowing in regard to the use of holy water within some areas of Christianity. ~

Further is support of this in the statement that any who are touched by a defiled person, will become defiled - which shows use in ceremony within some divisions of Christianity, in sprinkling holy water through out the congregation - and in similar use for entering places of worship. ~

(There is a seeming connection of this ceremony - purification water - and the golden calf as well, which I further explore within later entries)

Studies In Theology; 11/30/2006 (More Special, Smoke & Un-Clean Rejects?)

2006-12-17T11:02:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/30/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/30/2006

In Numbers 16, it describes an uprising from none other than the Levites! Being said to be from three Levites specifically together with 250 other leaders of the community and further yet - prominent members. The initial three being stated as from the tribe of Reuben - then somehow affiliated with the tribe of Levites. (Perhaps in some transference regard as per eldest sons?)

The reasons for the conspiracy is said to be a discrepancy about Moses being more special than the community of Israel (having themselves been set appart by the Lord - though obviously forgetting the recent transgressions) then as well, complaints about dieing in the wilderness and not yet having been brought into the new homeland.

Strange to read why they had just been told why it was they were not shown into the promised land - and again it is said that they are complaining about it. ~

Again Moses spares them from the wrath of the Lord, but only temporarilly as in 16:31 it describes the wicked men and their families being swallowed up by the Earth - opening its mouth to do so, then again closed over them.

Then fire is said to have burned up the 250 others. ~

With their passing, the bronze incense burners they brought to the Tabernacle as offering were hammered out and used to overlay the altar - introducing a further metal to the Tabernacle configuration; Bronze. ~

This was done to warn others against such uprising and unauthorized burning of incense. But again more complaints, and again Moses attempts to spare them from the wrath. ~

It is then stated that a plague had already begun among the people - but Aaron burned incense and purified them, "standing between the dead and the living" with the incense and stopping the plague. ~

This is rather remarkable as described being that the dead are numbered at 14,700. ~

From a more analytical consideration as per metaphor perhaps in description - this could represent smoke acting to effect the contageon and then thwarting air born transfer of the disease - which seems a possibility in the culmination of because the plague stopped, Aaron returned to the Tabernacle. Indicating in a given interpretation that there waws some extended effort in the ploy to seperate the dead from the living in such a way - beyond simply standing there with an incense burner.

It also tends to suggest an effort of assigning the reason for the plague stopping, to that single incense burner as opposed to the effort it would take to seperate 14,700 dead from the living.

This perhaps in the same line of reasoning as per focus of attention and of course, focus then of belief. ~

Chapter 17 begins with efforts in settling the issue of chosen special guy through the use of staffs belonging to (yet again) 12 of the ancestral leaders with each having their name inscribed on their staff - to be placed in front of the Tabernacle - more so - in front of the Ark itself, where buds will sprout on the staff of the chosen. ~

(More tyhan likely, this being a very popular passage in the bible itself, from the perspective of several of the modern mimicry's in version of interpretation given the level in popularity of certain variations of sprouting buds)

Within this is something which supports the idea of Levites being considered as 0 (zero) in the enumeration order of tribes with it being said that all 12 leaders will present a staff, as well as Aaron to represent the Levites (which then was 13 staffs total - including that of Aaron/Levites). Further this idea of 13/0 is supported in the dictation that the Levites are to recieve no allotment of land as will the other tribes. ~

Aarons staff then sprouted, budded, blossomed and produced almonds - and then was to be permanently placed before the Ark of the Covenant. ~

This brought more complaints in the tone of fearing to go near the Tabernacle because; everyone who even comes close to the Tabernacle, dies! ~

In considering the symbolism of the almonds now being affiliated with Aaron - yet more in the direction of suggested sustenence. ~

Perhaps extending symbolically to his line as well within the described occurence of sprouting, budding... etc.... ~

Chapter 18 then begins with what appears to be another area of the developing repititions (points of contact/transference?) that describes the priestly duties around the Tabernacle and Ark. ~

In 18:10 there is an interesting point of seperation being that all males in Aarons family may eat of the most holy offerings. With sacred and special offerings being available to all members of his family. ~

It is then stated that everything in Israel being set apart for the Lord, also now belongs to Aaron. This also includes the first born of every mother except for cttle, sheep and goats - which will still belong exclusively to the Lord.

It is then stated that with this, Aaron must always redeem his first born sons and ceremonialy un-clean animals (all when one month old) with 5 pieces of silver. ~

Besides seeing this as another foreshadowing in the regard to Baptism concerning modern forms of Christianity, I see another intriguing possibility with the combination of first born sons - and ceremonially un-clean animals not only being associated in similar treatment symbolically, but as well now being seperated from that exclusively as the Lords. ~

Perhaps more in the direction similar to that which gained Jacob the blessings while being the youngest?

12/17/2006 - Further diversity in segregating unclean and clean? Duality, symbolic transference using the un-clean animals having been redeemed consistently while being seperate from all other variations? Since it is that they are unclean would this then lend more to Aaron of lording over the rejects? Then further symbolically, in regard to the lord having stated the Israelites as being not good and a stubborn people - is this then a symbolic relation considering the Israelites to the ceremonialy un-clean (and not good) in the care and redemption of Aaron? Such definitely stands to reason - especially when it is that anything seen as ceremonially clean, is sacrificed and consumed.

This presents an area of divergence which becomes more interesting the more it is considered. Symbolically in some ways, this then affiliates Aaron and his sons with that of the ceremonial un-clean animals. Those animals which are not good in the eyes of the Lord. As well, in regard to the previous cited statement of the Israelites being not good, it in some way affiliates them as well. Yet further this then presents somewhat of a contradiction in the various ways that Israelites can be seen as ceremonially un-clean with a priority on rectifying such to again be seen as ceremonially clean.

Perhaps it is that this presents a symbolic safety net in some respects being that Aaron is to always redeem those unclean first born? This in regard to the unpredictable elements of the Israelites becoming unclean individually as a matter of course (even in childbirth). So they will have a symbolic staging area so to speak, until they again become ceremonially clean?

This further then presents areas of consideration within the larger duality seeming to develop. Is this, beyond being a social divergence, suggestive of a sort of purgatory having been constructed through such consistent actions as presenting such separation? Could this then be seen as Aaron (and the priests) being lords to some degree, over a sort of hell in symbolism? Redeeming, and in that then, shepherding to some degree - that which is seen as ceremonially unclean?

I can see where this is very possible as the precursor to what is commonly known within certain variations of modern Christianity, as representing purgatory.

Studies In Theology - 11/29/2006 (Moses Married Outside Of Israel, Recon. & Leprosy)

2006-12-15T10:35:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/29/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/29/2006

Almost directly at the beginning of Chapter 12, it describes Moses as marrying a Cushite - a female from outside of the Tribes of Israel - which then is said to have brought great criticism, even from Aaron. ~

In thinking about this, it really was the better move in my opinion to have married outside of the tribal affiliations - any other choice within the tribes would have caused a disruption in the social climate through making one thing or the other seem more special than the rest. ~

As a side note here; To me, it seems better in such a situation to have a single point of disdain - contained - than many running rampant.

Then in 12:02, it again depicts a diversity in Aaron and another in rhetorically asking if the Lord had not spoken through them, too? Suggesting an example of that diversified result in the inversion I have described . ~

It then continues to describe the Lord as actually appearing in the pillar of cloud and standing at the entrance of the Tabernacle. ~

It then describes Miriam (Moses and Aarons, sister) as turning white from leprosy immediately after the cloud moved from above the Tabernacle. Then comparing her to a still born baby decayed at birth. ~

Numbers 13 begins with stating instruction from the Lord to send people to explore the land of Canaan - which the Lord is supposedly giving to the Israelites.

It is specifically requested to send one leader from the 12 ancestral tribes.

This then indicates further social development within the tribes - perhaps even divisions within them as well as progress in formation from marriage and procreation? Most likely as result of intermingling with the others living amongst the tribes. ~

It then begins to describe instructions in 13:17 which are very much intended as reconnaissance - information gathering. ~

While being rather sound in the manner of leadership and preparedness, it sounds strange to have to explore the land which is to be given to them. ~

The land is found to be flowing with milk and honey - bountiful as it were, but with good reason as is described in the people living there are powerful. ~

Of course it is immediately suggested to take the land in 13:30, but just as predictably there is then reconsideration, which then leads to scare tactics about the giants that inhabit the land in an effort to dissuade the Israelites from wanting to go there. ~

This seemed to have a different effect on the people, creating instead of not wanting to go - more a sort of response which seems to be a precursor to the stereotypical (as is widely chided) modern Jewish rant; "If only we had died in Egypt! Or even here in the wilderness!" and followed of course with questions as to why they came all this way to die in battle? "Carried off as plunder - better to return to Egypt" which is then described as becoming plots to choose new leadership.

This then brings a change of information being that the land is now described as wonderful and on about the lord delivering as is common, thus far. ~

This brings the Lord again to reassure Moses with even replacing the "nation" of Israel if need be in light of the rebellion. ~

Then in 14:14, after another passive aggressive exchange in convincing the Lord not to do such..... it is stated that the Lord lives among his people (to paraphrase).

This would seem to present some options similar perhaps to what I have described as per embodiment of, and interaction with that inversion through the single point of focus. ~

It nowhere presents prophets among the tribes (except for the recent spirit issue), and maintains that Aaron and his descendants are priests - though having been spoken through, which then also presents the suggestion of Moses being perceived in some way, as that entity. ~

My inclination is very much more to the idea of the presented inversion and diversity. While again, in 14:18, it specifically refers to God as he - again lending to the idea of individual. ~

It then turns toward what appears to be a middle ground decision in stating that the Lord now forbids any of the Israelites from entering the land due to disrespect; "They will never even see the land sworn to their ancestors!" ~

Just as a note; again the number 40 appears with some frequency in being the number of days that those called ancestral leaders spent gathering information - and then the number of years that the children of the Israelites are now to wander in the wilderness - after their parents drop dead for their transgressions. Excepting of course, for "Caleb" and Joshua.

The children of the others to live as shepherds in the wilderness (before being allowed entry) while Caleb and Joshua were to be allowed immediately, their share of land. ~

Caleb being of the tribe of Judah, and Joshua that of Ephraim. ~

As I read this, I cannot help but see some tactical wisdom in the longer term sense in what is suggested here. That being presumably to hold off the majority of the populous in the interest perhaps of avoiding costly confrontations - while then simultaneously establishing a presence in the "promised" though populated land - for obvious purposes in that line of reasoning. ~

This is then shown to have been the wiser course when it is described that again the people rebelled and attempted entry of their own only to be met with attack and expulsion. Which of course more than likely ruined any chance of the infiltration with only a few from the tribes of Israel. Making them all now seem as a body of enemy. ~

In the next chapter it is directed to again observe sacrificial offerings when finally arriving in the land given them.

These sacrifices yet again, contain grain offerings which is an oddity given the transient aspects and the recent want of sustenance. ~

As a notable progression in development here- wine is now allowable as part of offerings. ~

In Chapter 15, a bit further - 15:13 - it then describes a differentiation which is pronounced; Native born Israelites.

This being quite interesting given the nomadic nature of their existence. ~

It then continues in stating that native born Israelites and foreigners are equal before the Lord and subject to the same decrees, as a permanent law. ~

Then it described that the first of each crop in the promised land must be set aside for the Lord -

In 15:37, it is instructed to attach blue tassels to the hems of clothing to remember the commands of the Lord. - This is notable if I say, in being related to the cloth color used in the Tabernacle, and further seems to be a precursor to the Catholic Rosary. ~

Though it is that this is described as an attachment to clothing - it still seems to serve a similar purpose as does the more modern Rosary.

Studies In Theology - 11/28/2006 (Birthing Ones Self As The Son Of God (Should Have Been A Shiksa?) & Again With The Self Adulation Paradox)

2006-12-14T06:55:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/28/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

SELF ADULATION PARADOX?

11/28/2006

In chapter 11:20, it eludes to yet another interesting suggestion pertaining to the Lord. This through stating in a third person sense (as if God were speaking) that the people, "rejected the Lord, who is here among you." Then, in the same context suggests that it (the word of God presumably) is referring to Moses. ~

Then directly following this it states that Moses responds to the Lord. ~

The suggestion that Moses may be the Lord is all the more interesting given that it is supposedly the Lord telling Moses to speak those words to the people. ~

It again seems as if there is some suggested embodiment pertaining to the idea of God itself within the context of the words to be spoken. ~

Such would establish nothing less than at least a perceived plurality - and further yet, even a partial diversity within such suggested embodiment. ~

As I continue reading, something even more remarkable surfaces pertaining to diversity. In 11:25, it depicts the Lord placing the spirit upon 70 others chosen, then further that they began to prophesy. Further it states that Moses actually promoted (wished more of) it.

This demonstrates a purposeful introduction of inconsistency - which then would become consistency on a different level. ~

In permitting the various perspectives as they prophesied - it most surely demonstrates a divergence from that contained point of focus (and Aaron) as well. The different elders and leaders as they prophesied - then introducing variations of/between/within their respective tribes. ~

This then easily being further observed (as noted) in the modern diversities within various nationalities pertaining to the Hebrew methods of worship. Even more in depth, such could be representative of even the diversities in modern forms of worship. Including more fanatical mutations of similar social/theological structures. ~

The progression of these diversions, as it were - most definitely comparable to the other books of the bible in concept even. Being various different voices then representing a whole - then again brought to the point of focus in regard to a single entity. ~

Even further yet is a pattern in progression when then considering the Apostles. though, in a deeper sense within that progression (tendency toward pattern - perhaps cyclically) much more becomes apparent regarding symbolism and transference; Jacob was renamed by God to the title of Israel - he was also noted as being the son of God.

Then, as we take into account the introduction of Christ as the son of God and as a sacrifice - symbolically then - through that line of reasoning and connection, Israel is the sacrifice.

Further, sociologically, this tends to suggest that somehow Israel was born out of itself in the form of Christ being a product of that line of belief.

The son bearing the son of God from itself in that line of symbolism - symbolically birthing itself for the purpose of a sacrifice. ~

As previously pointed out, this could not happen again within the Christian belief structure without imposing a rather pronounced paradox. ~

Some might argue that this progression then suggests the body of Christ (Israel) as being God - which, as has been established in previous books and chapters - is not possibly the case given that Jacob won the name of Israel from God to begin with. ~

Further, this then implies that Israel possesses some feminine quality in having born forth - not only the son of God - but a symbolic representation of itself - and in that, Jacob.

A feat never to be repeated within the idea of Christianity! ~

Interesting that such a line of association(s) then suggests that Israel is of a female sort - given that Jacob was a man - and a man that was repeatedly duped by his son and his own wife. ~

Maybe he would have been better off with a shiksa? ~

Lucky Devil! ~

Such a consideration then adds other aspects to the Roman role in the crucifixion (of Christ and others) of Christ.

There were many Jews in that culture, which means firstly that they were conquered (the Jews) by the Romans to begin with - or they would not have been a part of the Roman empire at all.

Then symbolically (and inadvertently) doing the dirty work to carry out the much larger symbolism within their somewhat mundane (though quite brutal) punishment. ~

In 11:31, it states that the Lord sent a wind from the sea carrying quail three (3) feet deep.

This (the quail) was then spread around the camp to dry.

Drying meat out of doors requires an atmosphere which is more dry than that which produces dew.

It is described as the meat then making them sick - which seems as though the climate was not conducive to drying meats - it is stated as the Lord striking them with a plague for wanting meat from Egypt.

It is stated that the illness struck even while they were gorging themselves. ~

After burying the dead, it is sadi that the tribes moved to another location.

Studies In Theology - 11/27/2006 (Up Jumped The Devil! & The Burden Of People Eating Manna)

2006-12-13T08:07:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/27/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/27/2006

Returning now to the Book of Numbers (the 4th book) after having documented a majority of my more recent thoughts in other directions - Chapter 10 continues in describing again (point of consistency, contact - transference?) the method for travel of the Israelites - followed directly with a description of Moses speaking to his brother-in-law - presumably being the son of the shepherd Moses met while in the wilderness - "....don't leave us... you know the places in the wilderness where we should camp...be our guide...."

This contradicts the previous statement of following the fiery cloud where e'er it may go - as The Lord. Perhaps again eluding to an embodiment of some sort within a transference? ~

Directly following this in 10:33, is again suggested that the Lord show them where to rest, through the Ark of the Covenant. Notably stating that the Ark would be leading the procession instead of within the previously described formation. ~

Beyond the described transgression against the instructions for order in travel, this then seems to relate the brother-in-law with not only the Ark of the Covenant, but as mentioned with the Lord as well. ~

It then continues with suggesting that during travel - as the Ark is carried - that the Lord is out and about so to speak. For some reason as I consider that description, I am reminded of an old saying when happening upon a bit of a surprise - that old saying being; Up Jumped The Devil! ~

This is followed with a description of summoning the return of the Lord to the Ark, when it is again set down. But I have never heard any old saying about Down Sat The Devil! ~

The old saying perhaps being relevant to "your enemies scattered......and flee before you...." though I have heard it used in situations relating to happening upon a person for instance, as well. A stroke of good luck for instance, is just as applicable in that use of terminology - perhaps suggesting a sort of affiliation between the two; as per good luck occurrence being as result of the devil fleeing? ~

Perhaps such an old saying only indicates the presence of an oddity which could indicate - hypothetically speaking - the presence of such possibilities in either respect. Especially given those considerations (social development and ecclesiastic change) post the introduction of Christ as I have begun to explore. ~

In Chapter 11 it is described that the people began to want of the previous ease in living (even while in slavery), and further for some meat. They as well complain about the manna they are eating which is said to have been procured as the dew lifted in the morning(s). ~

I have heard this suggested as even perhaps being some form of excrement - though as I read the description of it, I can find few creatures which come to mind that would produce such an excretion - further, especially given the terms used to describe it - and previously speaking of various types of vegetable matter and evidence of knowledge in cultivation - I cannot see where excrement would have not been recognized as such. ~

Another point of interest here is the presence of dew - which necessitates foliage and moisture, which then suggests that the known aspects of atmospheric change around Egypt since biblical times - is relevant to a greater area as well in knowing this to be taking place far outside of Egypt. This dew aspect contradicts the hot and dry descriptions elsewhere in these early books as well. ~

Again, in conjunction with the dew, this suggests an atmospheric process of/within condensation - which in turn suggests elements present though susceptible to such a process, as to manifest in result of condensation. ~

From another perspective - given consideration to foliage being present and further then assuming that the presence of dew was coincidence with the appearance of the manna - this could then make possible something produced of the insect realm? ~

While not ruling out some atmospheric exchange, the description of coriander seed like definitely implies a formative influence other than something similar to the condensation process. If I were to liken the description to food stuffs I know of, it would seem to me that cous cous fits the description rather well. ~

Perhaps dew could be interpreted as a mild rain in those instances where manna appeared? Thus widening the possible contributors to a presence of mineral sort, within rain fall (dew). I have seen deposits from what we know to be hard water - so I cannot see it as all too impossible that a resin could be present in precipitation. ~

Then further, what of manna being as result of that concentrated influence described even as smoke and fire within the condensation process? ~

Then again, in a more humorous note - it could have just been a bunch of smart pills - but I doubt it given the presence of cultivation and live stock. ~

In 11:12, it describes Moses as referring to the Israelites as if they were an actual physical load to bear, and then even refers to them as a suckling child. This in what I presume is a prayer concerning meat to feed them all - which then culminates in an ultimatum and a pronunciation of decided misery. ~

It then describes the Lords response as in referring to it as a physical burden as well, asking that 70 men (elders and leaders - notably it was 70 people said to have entered Egypt initially which then became the Israelites) be summoned so the Lord can transfer some of the spirit which resides upon Moses, and place it upon them as well. Thus bearing the burden of the people along with Moses. ~

Again, two examples of transference - One being obviously in moving some of the spirit from Moses to those selected, and further suggesting that such spirit is a source of burden - of the people (Israelites) no less, in representation. ~

Further, this then again illustrates a diversity (further diversity) beyond that line of separation having been established in the concentration of focus. Then substantiating that diffused effect among the Tribes. ~

This could as well, associate spirit with the sins of the people through that suggested burden - which then, as speculation - likens Moses to the Golden Medallion on which (in which) Aaron was to place the sins of the people. As well it could liken him to the scapegoat and again, illustrating a point within a developing process which will eventually culminate with the introduction of Christ.

Further in this line of thought - less spirit then (less burden) - is associated with less power - but more directly would indicate fewer transgressions having occurred within the body populous of people. ~

The Israelites must really have been having one heck of a party!

Studies In Theology - 11/26/2006 (continued) (Considering A Metaphor?)

2006-12-12T13:03:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;
Popular Christianity 11/26/2006
Study Notes And Journal Entries,
An Observation
By
David A. Archer
02/15/1968
(r.f.p.p.s.h.)
11/26/2006 (continued)

To further toy with the comparison(s) I have been exploring between the early Tribes of Israel and the applied version of representative democracy in which we exist, I managed to research the order of early established colonies for this purpose, as well as a few other forms of classification associated with them - from the time of English establishment (quite interesting) until the re-ordered use (the order of colonies) in application of those applied concepts under Liberty as it were.

Initially, the English Colonies in direct comparison to the Tribes of Israel are as follows;

(note; a decided discrepancy in regard to Levite placement as being 0, and thus first, and the possible placement as 13th - and thus last - within the ten number aspects I have already presented. This of course is an effort of direct comparison as per listed Tribes of Israel, both camped and in motion for exploration sake). ~

I examine the listed colonies both in order they were said to be established, then in the order they Entered the Union - and some really interesting aspects - coincidence - begin to surface.

Since it is that I am currently (topically) studying the Book of Numbers - it is that I am inclined to then affix some basic enumeration - and numerology tactic to the configurations (please note the discrepancies between the two examples of order - as result of internet information or perhaps a deeper consideration socially?);

LISTED COLONIES CHART

If it is that these are then grouped in 3's - in a similar manner to the Tribes of Israel - treating Delaware (in the 6-7 position pertaining to the first example list) - as the middle (Levite) tribe - it begins to have some rather interesting traits. One of which being that Delaware is in that 6-7 place - and further is the future Capitol of the United States - even then being the first Colony to Enter the Union. Which then re-orders that list as such;

	NUMBER IN ORDER	TEN NUMBER OFF-SET		DATE ESTABLISHED	A RELATIVE VALUE

FIRST TEN NUMBER CYCLE	1.	(0).	DELAWARE	1638	9
	2.	(1).	PENNSYLVANIA	1682	8
	3.	(2).	NEW JERSEY	1664	8
	4.	(3).	GEORGIA	1732	4
	5.	(4).	CONNECTICUT	1635	6
	6.	(5).	MASSACHUSETTS	1620	9
	7.	(6).	MARYLAND	1634	5
	8.	(7).	SOUTH CAROLINA	1663	7
	9.	(8).	NEW HAMPSHIRE	1623	3
SECOND TEN NUMBER CYCLE	10.	(9).	VIRGINIA	1607	5
	11.	(0¹⁾	NEW YORK	1664	8
	12.	(1)	NORTH CAROLINA	1653	6
	13.	(2)	RHODE ISLAND	1636	7

Several things to note and explore here - the first of which that comes to mind being the difference between information pertaining to early colony establishment as per internet information - which itself, as I look at it in the context of this comparison with that social structure in mind - of the Tribes of Israel, could be more as result in that change in order with the command to travel depicted within the bible - now surfacing as discrepancy pertaining to order in such forms of information listing.

Most pronounced in that line of thought is the obvious shift of Massachusetts between the 1st and 2nd placement - which would further indicate it being representative of a leader aspect beyond individual tribe in that sense - grouping focal point as it were - which as well then coincides with the idea of Hub in some contexts. ~

Further then, the list being Massachusetts as 1st - then places Pennsylvania in that 6 -7 place - which then leads to Philadelphia not only having been the largest city in the time period - but further acting as the first functioning Capitol. ~

Without getting to involved with the obvious myriad in combinations pertaining to apparent relativity in enumeration - it can be said in looking at such developments, that there seem to have been at least two distinct mind sets within the progress of such developments _ that isn't to say dictating influences, but only distinct differences in motion so to speak. Which can be depicted as a point of reference in the subtle differences between considering 0 (zero) as a place and conversely not doing so in considering 1 (one) as a certain beginning point.

I am not asserting that such is the reason for said distinctions - nor is it that I am asserting such was a conscious effort in application - but only an efficient tool in illustrating such differences. ~

Since I am listing such things at the moment, I will include the order of Capitols (as per internet) at the time of the revolution;

PHILADELPHIA
BALTIMORE (BACK TO PHILLY)
LANCASTER, PA.
YORK
PRINCETON
ANNAPOLIS
TRENTON
NEW YORK
D.C. (DELAWARE)

This then presents a sort of combination pertaining to that 6 - 7 placement; Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland and on the list of Capitols - Trenton.

This line of thought and application then can be reasoned of course, in various other combinations pertaining to placement in that line of reasoning applied to other aspects within these developments.

While not really substantiating anything, I find it wonderfully entertaining food for thought considering influence at the least - if not just a manner in which to consider things in observation which may be somewhat out of the norm. ~

Most definitely some things to explore in such relations. perhaps even a notebook worth of attention, of its own as I have considered? ~

For now, back to the book of Numbers.

Studies In Theology - 11/26/2006 (Ecclesiastics In The Modern Atmoshpere &The Devil Quoting Scripture)

2006-12-12T12:56:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/26/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/26/2006

In considering the effects of Ecclesiastic movement in the modern day - it is evident that the standard application of such designs (as political tool) actually has further ramifications within the modern social conditioning, speed of information transfer and the atmosphere which that yields (as explored previously).

As if to be some byproduct, there seems to be a considerable area which becomes quite disheveled from what must surely have been seen as standard application in such directions as Ecclesiastic endeavors - though with little consideration of and within that amplification (distortion) and displacement. ~

If I am not mistaken, historically it has been quite common for Ecclesiastics (church sort of politics and agendas) to shift in some respect, with changes to itself as well as changes within other political atmospheres.

Something of a new development seems to arise in that modern use and application. ~

Such peripheral results, I suppose can be seen as useful in some respects from certain perspectives (even those opposed to the church for instance) given then the apparent tendency for such areas of confusion to then gravitate toward the more topical - readily available - apparent stability (consistency) within such concerns - regardless, in most instances of how relevant they may be to actual Ecclesiastic and religious concerns. ~

In that sense then, is a layered effect which can then be perceived as competing elements with/of and within such concerns. ~

I might say that from what I can see, it is then that within such concerns - is actually a body considered of worship which has more to do with having been fodder for/from political movement, than in regard to the idea of worship. ~

This then being layered even within itself. ~

It is an incredible facet in regard to various mimicry's both related to genuine efforts in compliance, and those purposefully introduced for which ever reason (not being the subject matter, here-in). ~

In many regards, this consistency hearkens again to the physical realm - being that of the Devil as it has been noted and described - then further even gives a vantage point to the idea of the Devil quoting scripture for his own ends. ~

An intriguing social interaction to say the least, in and as result of an ideology pertaining to its own variable facets and elements. ~ At times, the idea and manifestation of the church being nothing much more than a cult like atmosphere.

Many forget to acknowledge, that within the idea of Christianity - is then, the idea of the Devil (as with many other belief structures, there is a good and a bad). ~

This isn't to say that opposing influence exist elsewhere, only that such is specifically denoted as a consistent dynamic within the idea of Christianity. ~

For some reason, not of my concern, people tend to forget that something which they may categorize as the Devil has as much reign with and in the use of scriptures (for instance), as do those of a perceivably more righteous bent. ~

Which then raises the question (as I suspect is designed in such efforts) as to the validity of various mimicry's?

Who then is to say that mimicry's put forward for which ever reason, are not just as valid as other usages of such writ?

Beyond concerns with efficiency, and even more specifically post the introduction of the idea of Christ - what besides common well being truly dictates such usage? ~

In that respect from my personal perspective - such results and quality of living past that point of Christ, is/are very much our own responsibility aside from very few (comparatively) guidelines within that belief structure. ~

Which of course, then tends to show some different light on the idea of the Devil himself. ~

It perhaps even presents a duality in consideration even, between the idea(s) of God and The Devil in sort of an anonymity - as if some deeper deal were struck with that idea in the application of Christ?

The age old, though seldom recognized dichotomy then is present - The Lord, being all mighty, could surely do away with the Devil in a feld swoop so to speak - BUT, very much at the loss of all that was put forward in creation so to speak. ~

Truly an incredible dynamic to observe and speculate upon. Something most definitely for more mature areas of consideration in my future endeavours. ~

Studies In Theology - 11/24-25/2006 (Forms Of Media God Like? Electromagnetic Box)

2006-12-11T15:05:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/24-25/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/24-25/2006

In the effort to further document more jotted notes- I will continue with noting another area of displacement I have observed within the modern atmosphere - this obviously is related to the media; Film, Television, even the computer internet.

This displacement is more than readily recognized in regard to Theological ideas - and even further than in the ways I have addressed in other works - even more so, in that then, than the topical aspect of notoriety being seen as god like in the sense of that distance I have referred to - though this being more a loss of sensitivity beyond that incredibly consistent (perhaps over consistent as I have pointed out) body of frequencies - displaying inconsistencies within it. ~

This isn't to suggest that the larger process I perceive and have observed, is entirely of frequencies - only that the consistent atmosphere in which we commonly exist, seems to act as that displacement value in the natural sense - then amplified and emulated within our technological developments. ~

Within those media influences are distinct consistencies; Television being a more communal representation - then film producing a broader - majestic even, spectacle which translates into a direct effect within that speed in/of emulation in which we live/are. Both differing in a phase relation so to speak while co-existing. ~

Television, in that sense - seems the more fraternal - domestic sort of dynamic within the populous, where film very much seems to be similar to - in dealing with ideologies - even posing ability toward representing a sort of Theological presence (cult like) - it presents an experience where television presents social aspects - episodes, situation comedy - topical trends. Film holds greater potential depth in artistry and spectacle sort of aspects. ~

Within this continuing co-existence, television can then be seen as the set up - the conditioning tool so to speak of social aspects to some degree - this then presenting the opportunity for film to play into such dynamics - even planning larger spectacles months (at least) in advance. Playing into the potential of combinations of predicable trends. ~

Again, this all transpiring within that manufactured atmosphere (constituting much of the present - relatively -example electromagnetic box).

And yet further again, representing and resulting in a displacement within existence - one in which many of us commonly spend the majority of our lives. ~

It could be seen as those two dynamics, then further displaced with communications acting then as an added motion within it. ~

All then acting to displace and fill that area of focus (even sensitivity) once dominated with an interaction of sorts pertaining to that larger motion and process. Much of course through popular theological and social structures. ~

When this is then considered in conjunction with something such as Ecclesiastics in our modern day, it poses quite the event to say the least. Not to mention the facets of other potentials. ~

As something to further look into - again in my more mature years - Regarding modern calendar events pertaining to religion and holiday observation, it is rather a simple thing to see the larger motion in movement and development so to speak, between modern popular dates, and those of their initial inception into such recognized and celebrated positions.

The difference itself represents a sort of human migration - in regard to that larger influence and other aspects of our perceived reality and existence.

There is a distinct off-set from those initial calendar events.

In my belief this indicates more than the adoption of various means in establishing a consistency. It very much represents a motion - further, it represents aspects of the Proximity Gestation I have explored in the development and result(s) we live in, of the modern calendar year (possessing various other elements to comprise it) among other things. ~

Studies In Theology - 11/23/2006 (Puppy Kicker Mentality)

2006-12-08T09:55:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/23/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/23/2006

Just to catch up with my own thoughts and notes that I jot throughout the day - this entry will pertain to at least documenting them here-in. ~

Considering the attitudes quite present in modern American society pertaining to a want of eradicating even the idea of religion - beyond the common target of Popular Christianity - I personally cannot see the reasoning. ~

As I have stated, such focused and combative efforts really only act to insure the presence of such ideology if through nothing more than attention toward them. ~

Further, there seems to be some want, more a tendency, to attack the more efficient uses of such ideologies as is Popular Christianity - under that reasoning of eradicating it, if not at least complicating it in the effort to somehow thwart. ~

In effect such efforts (which I have come to refer to as puppy kicking in regard to abuse of those posing no threat other than a person choice for worship which isn't the popular cult activity of the day) only results in the greater ease for far less efficient Ecclesiastic movements to ensue. ~

Of course efficiency is a relative term - but the removal (replacement of) more socially conducive uses of such ideologies - then are usually only replaced with less socially concerned (politically motivated) versions and uses of such influences and bodies of people. Most times within that puppy kicking tendency, leaving the more caustic versions untouched.

Unfortunately, the more efficient uses of these structures - the more socially efficient - become targeted in that puppy kicking mentality - of course this results as a perceived victory for the puppy kicking element - but then usually renders such useless, and non conducive to society within the larger workings of said structures. Most times losing influence in the Ecclesiastic respect of even their own church's. Which then renders not only the church(s), but the long ingrained social aspects of even the idea of religion - no longer a benefit to society - but still just as impossible to ever remove - especially through the reasoning of persecution in the effort to somehow remove such long standing human means of social interaction. Essentially then damaging a rather efficient consistency within society - whether or not a person adheres to the beliefs of such structures. ~

From my own perspective, such efforts would best be employed through utilizing the existing consistency(ies) as opposed to the attempts at removing those structures. ~

At every turn within humanity, when some social vacancy has been created - there has always been something of a similar respect to replace said religious/social dynamic.

Some sad, desperate turds out there.

Studies In Theology - 11/21/2006 (Supernatural Considerations)

2006-12-07T08:50:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/21/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/21/2006

Immediately in chapter 8 of the Book of Numbers is another reference to 7. Being 7 lamp stands (gold). ~

I feel I should note how prominent metals are in the Tabernacle descriptions - gold and silver are mentioned quite a bit - as well as bronze a bit further on. It seems that just about everything is laden with gold or silver, which then leads me to consider the loadstone effect I have previously explored - further, it is notable that the false idol Aaron fashioned was gold as well.

Definitely evidence of a worth before the idea of value as we know today.

It (such metals) must have been rather plentiful to say the least - which then adds further support to the idea of that loadstone effect as opposed to supply and demand being initial reason(ing) for such perceived value/worth.

I should note that these early books in the bible are some of the first places where sums are derived through quantity and portion of these metals as well - at least from what I can recall at this point. (sums being coin worth - i.e. shekel - derived for what ever reason as a sum amount - which of course dates previously to other civilizations as well, in other manners of approach). This being somewhat of a consistency before standards for such were derived in a broader sense.

it definitely gives reason for pause considering that loadstone effect - given that such attempts were made to assess a perception of value and then present it in some standardized form.

Further this is interesting in being a standard within a nomadic people - though truly only recently nomadic (out of Egypt) in that sense. ~

SOME OTHER NOTES PERTAINING TO THE IDEA OF VALUE

In Numbers 8:05, it begins to describe a dedication ceremony concerning setting the Levites apart from the other tribes of Israel. Part of this is in shaving all of the hair from their bodies which immediately conjures images in relation to Egyptian influence - and further suggests a similarity in/with ceremonies concerning the touching of the dead during certain time.

It then dictates that the Levites must be presented to the Lord at the Tabernacle and the Israelites are to be present and to lay hands on them. This is to have been done to symbolize a special offering from the people of Israel (to the Lord). ~

There is then a noticeable use of transference in that the Levites were instructed to then lay hands on two young bulls meant for a burnt offering and a sin offering. ~

This seems similar to the previous descriptions pertaining to Aaron being anointed and those acts of transference within such ceremony.

As well it is that such could be seen as symbolic attempt yet again in that direction earlier explored pertaining to a social progression which eventually rendered and culminated with Christ. ~

This is substantiated in the next few paragraphs beginning at 8:16 - describing again, how the Levites now represent the first born sons of the Israelites - then further there is a reference to the passover in Egypt of striking down the first born - this all in close relation with The Lord claiming the first born of everything as quote; "Mine." ~

In chapter 9, it then again describes instructions for observing pass-over, and again there are instructions for those to celebrate second pass over for what ever reasons excluded them from observing the first pass over. ~

This is odd in that I am seeing another consistency develop within the work which further may support a sort of fold - points of contact/relation - weave aspect. This as it becomes more apparent that certain passages are repeated almost verbatim (some even exactly, I imagine) at later points in the work. These pass over instructions, being the present example. ~

12/07/2006 To note something which I touch on at a later point (more in depth than previously), this repetition which seems to occur, may have another facet as well in displaying a definite illusion within the most common perceptions of a chronological occurrence. Meaning, that within these repetitions, is the distinct possibility (and actuality in some instances it would seem) of that illusion concerning some distance of time between some of the examples presented as having been duplicated. This means that things within different books, may have transpired nearly at the same point in time as things in other places within the work - but the common perception of the Bible, is that there is some definite chronological movement of a time frame.

In chapter 9:15, it describes the method for which the Israelites would travel.

There is described a fiery cloud in the day, and a pillar of fire at night which dictates such travel direction and time of departure/arrival. ~

This tends to become rather surreal in an immediate sense.

From my present perspective, it doesn't mater in regard to supernatural and/or conversely physical explanation. I see the importance at this point in recognizing that it is/was a manifestation of some sort. A manifestation that is described as moving seemingly on a whim so to speak - which then would mandate the camp to follow where ever it lead to.

Further, this manifestation is also referred to as The Lord. This of course further indicating that multiple aspect. ~

In a supernatural sense, it is no more preposterous to consider such a manifestation as it is described, as it is to consider the idea of wielding such (similar) forces in the idea of witchcraft. In fact, from such a point of view - such could be considered a concentration of said variations of forces through the various ceremonies and symbolism's used within the Tabernacle. ~

From a perspective regarding the physical and potential scientific explanations - such a direction of reasoning would support the idea of proximity's, as well. ~

To consider such as outright Fantastique Fiction - is very much a lack of consideration - if not purposeful avoidance given the very scientific proofs of like mannered and similar power in our everyday lives - being electricity. ~

While electricity is manufactured as we know and use it, it is still very much of similar areas within existence (especially in naturally occurring forms) - even though, and especially though we can scientifically explain it. ~

This is not to say that electricity is God - and further is not to say that which is depicted as a burning cloud is electricity. Only that similarities as per existential properties are at least, possible.

It is only the common (saturated) aspect of electricity that makes such no longer acknowledged pertaining to electricity. It has in effect, conditioned a sort of numbness to such within the human creature. ~

In that then, it is all the more reasonable to consider such an idea as proximity influence in a larger sense.

Further, such is considerable reason to examine such a depiction for the potentials of consistency and tendency such variations in manifestation seem to have. ~

In chapter 10 there is another reference to silver, and yet further the enumeration of 2.

Silver Trumpets were said to have been fashioned in the interest of communication with all of the tribes - and the Lord as well.

One being blown, would summon only the leaders - both would bring all of the tribes to the Tabernacle.

This then was used with different signals to instruct the movement of camp in order of travel - again, only Aaron and descendants were permitted to blow these horns. ~

As well, they were used for sounding alarm, festivals and incorporated into ceremonies for burnt offerings and peace offerings. ~

It is then stated that the sound will remind the Lord of his covenant with you. ~

Studies In Theology - 11/16/2006 (Trial By Fire; Universal Concept?)

2006-12-06T10:54:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/16/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/16/2006

As I briefly recount my previous entry - I notice again the consistent attention given to the first born in a family. Notably, this hasn't been such a pleasurable thing given the manipulation concerning Jacob and Essau, the killing of the first born children (and animals) in Egypt.

Further then is in regard to naming Israel as a first born metaphorically (more symbolically) - which then poses another fold in duties within that body, being relegated firstly - to first born sons - then reassigned with the Levites substituting in those duties. ~

Without looking too deep, there is a definite form of fixation for some reason - and as I have addressed, an apparent attempt at re-asserting those blessings and duties firstly in upholding their transfer to Jacob (the youngest), then again supporting such transfer from him - to represent the first born sons of others - then further is the nearness to the point of focal priority that the Levites had (have?). Suggesting again an importance of being first born - but perhaps a different efficiency was sought in assigning transferring such firstly - as depicted - to the youngest, then further assigning such meaning to one tribe. ~

In the fourth chapter of the Book of Numbers, it again describes nearly ceremonial duties for the movement of the camp and Tabernacle. Much is stressed about colored cloth and skins of leather. ~

The Levites are listed in a division of three separate clans within the tribe itself. ~

In chapter five, it again describes attention to general hygiene - skin diseases - but further addresses tactics in presenting claims of and to marital faithfulness.

While it is that what is described seems archaic at least, given the trial by fire aspect - I immediately recall a similarity such has with civilization some considerable distance away from where it is that these actions are described as to have happened - and perhaps separated with time as well. The ceremonial similarity aspect I am referring to, was more directly related to fire, itself, than is the present example pertaining to bitter water - which basically suggests the ingestion of contaminated water in trying the guilt or innocence. ~

While these are both all but unheard of in modern society, it very much suggests at least a commonality of sorts for such tendencies within established human reasoning (of the time), which in turn may itself corroborate the existence of a closer connection - with existence, earlier in human history. A type of heightened sensitivity so to speak, within and of existence given that it was with reason of some sort that vastly different cultures embraced similar concepts regarding the physical and other aspects of existence. ~

It might sound hokey in many regards - but when considered, a person could even state that the human divergence through technology (and medicines) is much of similar beginnings, if not similar intention. More perhaps to manipulate that relationship between (within) the physical and other aspects of existence? ~

A person then has to see the presence of shaman and even witch doctors, as similar in course of attempt as well. ~

This lends a bit to the idea that at one point there was such a close relationship between ourselves and existence - that it even would have been possible to will something into a sort of shift so to speak - To change the spots on a leopard for example, with nothing much more than concentration - This further then demonstrates (given consideration of such a malleability at some point in time) the progressive solidification of existence as we continue - seeming to fall away from it.

As I have touched on, perhaps all is progressively becoming more solid? Perhaps even the trees will no longer grow some day - how ever far away it might be? ~

In chapter 6, it describes an interesting sect within the Israelites. A series of ceremonial actions a person may do to set themselves apart as special to the lord.

Among these actions is abstinence from alcohol, and further anything which is derived from a grape vine. ` They are to let their hair grow until such time as they have fulfilled their vows - apparently being rather up to themselves as per the substance of the vow(s) - being said that during this time they must be careful to do what ever they vowed in setting themselves apart as Nazerites.

This perhaps being a place to exercise ones own leanings - dispositions in personal atonement in various aspects?

As well as being able to again consume wine after completing said vows, the vow part itself, seems rather open-ended. ~

Again, in the seventh (7th) chapter is a reference to 6 and 12. 6 being the number of wagons being used to carry offerings, and 12 being the number of oxen being used for the wagons. ~

Symbolically then, this could be seen as representing the 12 tribes in a few ways - paired off in two's, as has been touched on - then further in the configuration previously relating to 6, and further yet then, relating the tribes (within that enumeration) with the symbolism of oxen - and those attributes which were present at the time; strength, utility and most likely a need of them for efficiency and survival. ~

It specifically relates such an association within 7:03. ~

These wagons were then distributed within the Levite tribe - giving two wagons to the Gershon clan and four wagons to the Merarite clan. Oxen respectively as 4 and 8. ~

No wagons or oxen were offered the Kohthites as it was theirs to bear sacred objects on their shoulders. ~

This then means that within 3 clan divisions of the Levites, one clan received 2 wagons and 4 oxen, while another- 4 wagons and 8 oxen. ~

Perhaps a symbolic division of the other tribes respectively, as well as some arrangement as per social order within that symbolic division? ~

It then depicts further assignment as per enumeration of the tribes in relation to the day a given tribe leader was set to present dedication gifts presumably in celebration of anointing the altar.

The first day was the tribe leader of Judah.
The second day, that of Issachar.
The third day, that of Zebulun.
The fourth day, that of Reuben.
The fifth day, that of Simeon.
The sixth day, that of Gad.
The seventh day, that of Ephraim.
The eighth day, that of Manasseh.
The ninth day, that of Benjamin.
The tenth day, that of Dan.
The eleventh day, that of Asher.
The twelfth day, that of Naphtali.

In chapter 7:89, it describes with no uncertainty, that Moses heard the voice of the lord from between the two Cheribim above the Arks cover - The place of atonement.

Substantiating the leanings toward a place of focus in the manner I have explored perhaps? A movable place of focus at that.

Studies In Theology - 11/13-14/2006

2006-12-06T09:45:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/13-14/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/13-14/2006

In Numbers 3 it again speaks of the Levites and then mentions them as substitute for all first born sons of Israel - again, reasserting first born males.

It then describes divisions within the Levites, as well, and then assigns areas for encampment around the Tabernacle (3 places) with Moses and Aaron encamped in the front of the Tabernacle.

Studies In theology - 11/11/2006 (continued) - (1, 0, or 13? 1 and 0 and 13?)

2006-12-05T10:09:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/11/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/11/2006 (continued)

In the second chapter of the book of Numbers, it becomes without question that all told, the Israelites are comprised of thirteen (13) seperations - tribes as it were, given that the descendants of Aaron and Moses - the Levites - weren't counted in the census. ~

Further, they travel with six (6) tribes in front and six (6) in the rear of them in procession - and as well are said to always occupy the center of the camp, with the other twelve (12) tribes evenly dispursed in said assignments, with three (3) tribes each to a direction. ~

This then raises question as to a numeric assignment for the Levites - given the obvious importance of such symbolism.

Is it that they are to have been considered the thirteenth (13th) tribe?

Is it, since it is stated that there are twelve (12) tribes, and that the Levites were not counted, that they are representative of zero (0)? ~

Consider that the first cycle of initial numbers (0-9) with/within the modern ten (10) base number system, begins with zero (0), this would then place the Levites in that first (1st) cycle considering the representation of zero (0) occupying the first (1st) place. ~

0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10

In considering such symbolism in regard to chapter 2, it then presents some interesting considerations - first (however coincidental) is that as the traveling configuration is depicted, it dictates six (6) specific tribes in front of the Levites and Tabernacle, and six (6) specific tribes behind.

There are sixty six (66) books in the complete work of the bible in popular Christianity. ~

As mentioned, there are instructed as an offering - two (2) rows of six (6) loaves of bread. ~

The travel procession is described in a seperation of four (4) srets of three (3) tribes each in division - according to assigned area in regard to the Tabernacle during camp.

The Eastern tribes were to lead the procession, followed by the three (3) Southern tribes just in front of the Levites, then followed directly by the three (3) Western tribes and then those of the Northern division - being all under their respective banners. ~

Considering the Levites as zero (0) (being in the first place of the ten number cycle), this then presents the combination(s) of zero (0) in the third (3rd) possition within the procession - but further then being first 91st) in said cycle (as well as presumably first in priority) then presents a symbolic representation of 1 and 3 in that position - which then relates again to the question of the Levites being counted as zero (0) or thirteen (13) in enumeration within the tribes? ~

Obviously, through a sort of proof in consistency as has just been evident - the Levites would be counted as zero (0) (and thusly 1 for reasons presented pertaining to the ten number cycle) but as well establishing that converse presence of being the thirteenth (13) tribe as themselves, as well.

Such is not consistent if the Levites are counted firstly (initially) as the thirteenth (13) tribe. ~

So then, within that relationship of ten number cycle - the tribe coutned as zero (0), is actually first in priority and in regard to that sequence of numeric cycle, then third (3) in procession within the traveling group example given in the book of numbers. ~

Using this same form of logic in regard to the other tribes and their positions encamped (directionaly) and with said procession - leads to some interesting combinations in regard to said numeric cycle and in reference to presented symbolisms. ~

Yet further, in considering such assignment in combinations between these given set examples - it then corroborates the idea previously presented in living representation(s) symbolically of said inversion sort of representation. ~

Yet further again - such applied logic then demonstrates effectively the potentials of the suggested sort of social filtration. ~

Definitely some rather cool stuff! ~

Early in the third chapter - is further support in the idea of single point of focus, through the reference of the Tabernacle actually being the lord I believe - in regard to an earlier occurence (Leviticus 10).

Innanimate symbolism representing the idea of God in a single point of focus - (Perhaps some living entity in or around the Ark/Tabernacle?) - this being a god previously represented in various living forms. ~

Looking further at the various combinations within enumeration of the divisions of the tribes of Israel - there is a difference between the listed order of census and the traveling order in the first two (2) groups of three (3), being interchanged in positioning between the listed census and marching order.

The group of three tribes assigned to the South of the Tabernacle when camped, actually travel closer (in the second spot) to the Tabernacle, though listed first in the census.

This means that the tribes camped to the East are the first three tribes in traveling order. ~

Something else as note is within the census listing, according to assigned area for travel - it progresses clockwise from East; 1-E, 2-S, 3-W, 4-N. According to area assigned for encampment then associated with traveling. ~

It would be a curious thing to see comparisons with Egyptian number symbolisms - even jsut pertaining to chapters and books. It would stand to reason of some influence carrying over from those earlier relationships. ~

Though immediately, this on a different note - the affiliation doesn't seem conducive in comparison given the recent example of Tribe configuration(s) in groups of three (rendering four sets) - As briefly mentioned earlier - the symbolism of two rows of six does seem in conjunction with the Star of David;

Division of rows then as such?

The Levites in this comparison, of course then being the center of the Star of David, as with the Tabernacle - though this very much is pre- Star of David, and may only be representative of things which influenced the design of the Star of David yet to be introduced at this point in the Bible. ~

Studies In Theology - 11/11/2006 (Chronological Layers and Heraldry)

2006-12-04T07:50:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/11/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/11/2006

Immediately beginning the Book of Numbers - it is evident that something similar to the fold and match potential I have observed in regard to symbolic points of contact (transference) - is inherently a part of the entire work as it is presented.

The very first sentence in this book states a placement being one year after having left Egypt - which of course then chronologically puts the events as occurring simultaneously with much of what has already transpired in the previous two books.

This then suggests a layered effect where such, in popular understanding, is hardly (if ever) acknowledged.

In that linear perspective so common within many aspects of society - such regard to placement and occurrence relatively, is scarcely considered. ~

Further, it then places the establishment of the Tabernacle within that first year - though still in the wilderness of Sinai. ~

It then goes on to again list tribes and leaders - but further in this then suggests something else rather interesting pertaining to some chronology aspect - given that in 1:16, after listing the tribes and leaders - it then states them as the leaders of their ancestral tribes. This suggests having been organized for a substantial period of time previous to that which has been described (and is most commonly perceived) thus far. ~

Again, in the first book beginning at 1:47 speaking of the Levite's not being included in the census - it then again supports the explorative idea pertaining to movement - in 1:50, and 1:51, it describes quite clearly the aspect and common occurrence of travel - of nomadic tendency. ~

This is really interesting considering the presence of both nomadic concerns, and as well those distinct instructions pertaining to cultivation. ~

Again, this may simply be as result of that fold chronologically in regard to the social progress and such changes within the social structuring and tendencies of the Tribes of Israel - but it very much corroborates those movement aspects explored previously. Further it suggests some form of permanent intention in assigning the entirety of the Levite's to such duties. ~

Further, as part of the described duties of the Levite's, is to camp around the Tabernacle to protect the community of Israelites from the Lords anger. ~

An incredibly vast area for speculation here.

Is it that the Lord is presumably always pissed at the Israelites?

Is it that they are to be insulated in the event that the Israelites suddenly mess up beyond correction from offerings (which are quite common in occurrence)?

Is it perhaps that these nomadic tendencies and within the idea of multiple aspects of said influence, that with each move perhaps there was an uncertainty as to the resulting combination en manifest of said influences - and it was the Levite's responsibility to effectively plumb said new variations? Especially early on?

Again, in such efforts - especially in combinations with the establishing of consistent manners through which to approach and address said point of focus - being the Tabernacle (physically in this instance) - is the obvious effort in addressing the consistent inconsistency of multiple influences perhaps - with a concerted consistency applied to said point of focus. ~

This then, given these consistencies - the appointment of the descendants of Aaron as priests - and of course the Levite's (including Aaron and Moses) - introduces a filtration of sorts in a social sense. ~

Again in this area within the Book of Numbers is suggested the importance of colors and patterns, given the instruction of the other tribes to organize themselves under family banners (in addition to the importance within the tabernacle of color and arrangement) - after having been assigned to an area - which then suggests - as I have explored briefly - a subtle hierarchy - most likely in a nomadic sense as well (organized hierarchy in both placement and travel as well as heraldry).

Family banners then being quite similar to that which we now know as Blazons and Heraldry from other parts of history which trace to established Israel in some accounts - though not necessarily a geographic place - and further as a part in combination with other examples of human tendency to such representation. ~

Said "assigned places" to camp/travel - then obviously in relation (symbolically) to the previously described (though chronologically removed) bread offering in a very specific configuration and of very specific measure. ~

Studies In Theology - 11/09/2006 (Seventh Sun Of The Seventh Sun - Of The Lunar Calendar? Social Barometer's?)

2006-12-02T08:51:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 11/09/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

11/09/2006

In having been transposing various notebooks into document form - and considering the more recent weather patterns turning expectantly toward winter (save of course for the more recent run of 60* + weather at the end of November) - it is that my Theology has slowed a bit as far as studies. ~

I did just yesterday, enter a supplemental in electronic form - to the body of already published (and displayed) notes - it concerns an observation outside of the recent study (now being within Leviticus and Numbers). ~

Last evening I found yet another observation in regard to social movement within that larger process, with theological ideology as a point of reference. it involves developing directions resulting from fringe areas and further the human tendency - for various reasons - to stifle those developments. Particularly in certain political atmospheres - such relating to Ecclesiastic concerns most definitely. ~

Returning to study notes;

Again, I see a significance with certain enumerations being presented specifically, though this is common (even this far) within this work - this example is in Leviticus 24:05. It specifically states that a certain amount of bread (certain number of loaves) will remain as representing a permanent/re-occurring offering - then goes further to insist that the required number of loaves be arranged in a specific enumerated configuration; Being two rows containing six (6) loaves each. ~

While it is not stated as per specific reasons for this - it is obvious that the significance may more than coincide with the twelve (12) houses of Israel - being that such is the other predominant place where twelve is cited as of importance. ~

Given the importance of symbolism, this then suggests that the two rows hold some meaning as well - perhaps indicating a balance? Symmetry? And again, is the presence of six (6) - which of course will soon be the number of individual areas around the center point of the Star of David (as further association?). ~

Again, while it isn't specified - these occurrences are indicative of at least a developing consistency at this point. ~

Further, as previously suggested - such consistency and symbolism may well translate into points of contact as per relation (an inter-relation perhaps) within the work as an entire consideration - inter-working aspects so to speak, in a symbolic manner. ~

This configuration (with the mentioned loaves) suggests a paring aspect as well as symmetry. Suggesting a definite order of progression in such specific paring, as symbolism. ~

It is further specified that four quarts of flour are to be used for each loaf - this instruction appears in the 24th chapter - which then makes possible (though not specified) a symbolic point of reference in both the four aspect, and the two - given the configuration.

Further then, though at this point it is presumably yet to have been included - the Book of Numbers is placed within this work (the Bible) as the fourth book. ~

Such could prove as quite interesting for speculation sake, if nothing else. Again, simply through applying basic and broad consideration for symbolism and the obvious importance even thus far - of various examples of symbolism. ~

In Leviticus 25, there is a notable change beginning to be present - that being a slight shift from the nomadic shepherding to that of cultivating/farming so to speak. This is obvious in chapter 25 being concerned with presenting instructions - which present and provide that the land should be cultivated with a sabbath, as it is described. A year of rest where no crops can be purposefully planted.

This of course as common knowledge, was stated as to be observed every seventh year. This,as well as being sound agricultural advice in not depleting the soil through allowing it to lay fallow - is also another appearance of seven. Again as speculation, this will come to further be represented within the Star of David as well.

12/02/2006 Just to note the rather pronounced social oddity here - we are presented a nomadic people, that are somehow managing to cultivate crops- further letting the land lay fallow every seven years.

In regard to the idea of a cyclical pattern in cultivation - through the symbolism and then further through applied symbolism (transference) - it would suggest that when applied in a broader sense - there should be an area within the social dynamic no less, which will remain un-cultivated so to speak. ~

Though this is admittedly my own perspective and at least considerably conjecture at this point, there is some wisdom within such applications given the many aspects of human progress and tendency, development and simple interaction.

It would seem, given such were applied within a social dynamic - that the example area(s) would then develop in direct - and of direct influence of the current condition of the given society (social atmosphere) it was within. Displaying the naturally occurring social elements most present in the example area - this as result of that representation pertaining to that which grows of its own within this applied ideology.

That is again, if it were that such an individual and/or area were allowed to develop as and as result of such a ploy - a state of conditioning. ~

From what I think would be a sociological perspective, I think something of the sort would be rather brilliant given the obvious uses in many ways of what would amount to be an indicator of sorts - a social barometer in regard to the example area(s), as well as much more (in a productive sense as well).

Consider the usefulness within such organized social structuring, of a point of reference devised entirely from the condition presently of the surrounding social environment (through a given span of time) - the successes and failures - of a given society (environment) as well?

To leave that point of reference "un-planted" - meaning perhaps in such application as is a living metaphor within the idea presented of no cultivation (to leave fallow)- that the given example is to remain un-influenced beyond the more common, naturally occurring transitions within the given social atmosphere - then further to remain un-harvested in much the same respects so as to always have a point of reference in regard to said condition of naturally occurring aspects within that social atmosphere. ~

Within the direction of this thought (again, admittedly my exploration) - and again within the re-occurring symbolism's - seven becomes significant with such applications (though in a future sense at this point in the work) through the relationship with the Star of David perhaps?

As a very interesting extension of such an exploration, it could be then reasoned that perhaps, if even through natural course as result of applied ideologies within this body of works - that David as depicted within it, was perhaps the first example of such ideologies in applied usage through symbolism? This then lends more depth to the idea of king in such an example - when it is that those potential social indicator aspects are applied (and considered).

Further then, this would also be an extended aspect of Sovereign in regard to such a relationship which until such a time, was not a functioning facet of such a position - then even further I would imagine, appearing in a very few examples afterwards. ~

When considering such an idea in regard to modern societies, the potential of it (as applied ideologies through such a method) as a successful result is rather exciting. Something similar could very well prove to be an accurate representation of the health and condition of society. ~

Such presents many other potential facets as well, in regard to other explorations of/within the idea of representative democracy and even as per human advance in ways (and in relation to) I have put forward (explored) in other notes.~

Even in considering the larger influence (especially before the advent of technology) of "Popular Christianity" on society simply as a common and present influence (structure) - the possibility of something similar to have already manifested is more than a considerable possibility - again if only even through happenstance as result of the popularity and saturation of such consistencies as is Popular Christianity and the Bible. ~

As a personal note; the trick then within that possibility, would be in finding and observing the consistencies of such resonations from such an influence as was/is popular Christianity - of and still remaining within society - in order to more appreciate - if not utilize those possibilities as they may naturally occur. ~

Of course I presume such orientation as finding those consistencies, grows more difficult every day given the modern directions of various advance. ~

Truly intriguing as I muse at my own perspective in those directions. ~

In 25:08, it then mandates that such an observed sabbath is to be recognized and organized into sets of seven years - seven sets to be more precise, which then adds up to 49 years signifying the end of that cycle - presenting a jubilee beginning on the day of atonement in the first year of the next cycle, presumably then being the 50th year of the previous cycle. ~

12/02/2006 I have scribbled a note here, in the margin of my other scribbles - which directs me to explore perhaps a relationship of what we know to be symbolism of anniversaries in our modern day - i.e. a "golden" anniversary - a "silver" anniversary... on and such. Which I think would be at least interesting in comparison with such a cycle of sets of seven years. Being that there would also be a procession within those sets of applied symbolism's.

It then continues to indicate a domestication of sorts from being nomadic, through referencing the sale of land through actually being the sale of a potential number of harvests remaining within the presented cycle.~

Again, in relation to the applied symbolism I explored, this would equate to a social cycle of Seven sets of Kings (in progression), each set then containing seven kings (in progression), itself. ~

As yet another fun observation, when applied to modern enumeration, the representation of that 7th King of/in the 7th set, would actually be in the 7th place of the 6th group within the ten number structure - this being that the first set would be within the 1-10 group, then the second representing the 11-2o, and so on in that seemingly off set manner I have presented in the Basic Math Example of Proximity Gestation.

This seventh place then, is very easily reasoned as the center area within the Star of David. ~

In Leviticus 26 - it describes blessings for obedience and again advises against false idols - which again could be represented as acknowledged as within the two rows, of six loaves (2-6). ~

Studies In Theology - 10/26/2006 (Further Modern Food Service Example)

2006-11-30T16:50:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 10/26/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/26/2006

In Leviticus 21, most of it is pertaining to the descendants of Aaron and priestly concerns in not becoming unclean. One of those concerns is to the touching of dead bodies - only certain relatives, some required to be virgin at the time of death can be touched without becoming unclean as a priest.

Peculiar when considered. Particularly in the day and age in which we live and the common mind set within society. ~

It continues and then addresses any descendants of Aaron being deformed - no longer being able to offer the food to his god or offer special gifts to his god.

He may still eat of the offerings regardless of the physical defect. ~

This does not mention mental instabilities as defect, but such may have been seen as some special attribute in that day and age as with many other cultures.

In Leviticus 22, it states something which further supports the idea of (modern) food service being adequate in a transference manner - in fulfilling basic requirements with no effort or knowledge. it instructs the priests that may find some outsider having eaten the foods meant as offering, to ask that they compensate the cost plus twenty percent (20%).

This being particularly if those eating it had no knowledge of the foods purpose in that instance. ~

Again, I see opportunity of co-existence simultaneously with no interference or offense either way. ~

OTHER FOOD SERVICE AS ATONEMENT NOTES

The temperature is dropping a bit, so I am off to crawl into my bed role. ~

Studies In Theology - 10/19/2006 (Human/Animal?)

2006-11-30T08:12:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 10/19/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/19/2006

Early, quite early in the morning - not quite even near sunrise. ~ I find that after some hours of sound sleep, that I am somewhat un-tired enough that laying here is a waste of time - so I have begun again to read further with Leviticus 20.

In chapter 20:02 I find another odd turn in relation to human sacrifice. It is that a rivalry of sorts was apparently in some effect given that it is a decree in this chapter that any sacrificing their children to "Molech" must be put to death - any that ignore such transgressions are to be cut off from the community. ~

This seems a bit odd given the previous instruction as per the (want of) sacrifice of Abraham's only son as a test of faith. Asking of him such a sacrifice being seen as a commitment in faith. ~

Then of course in Egypt, given the curse of killing first born sons (and further laying claim to all first born living things). symbolic beyond the presented reasoning in regard perhaps to a cleansing - more seeming to be a move toward gaining some advantage as per dominance in a species variation sense. Much as do some animals in killing the young of procured mates already having young off spring. ~

Then, I cannot help but see some relation with the situation of Jacob and Essau in the older child's blessing being past to the younger. ~

In that sense in regard to this importance and developmental progress in change - as per focus on children - even oldest children, there is evidence of a relationship of sorts and further, a consistency developing - Earlier actions continuing to manifest in more diffuse ways and combinations. ~

Further in chapter 20, we then see a change in punishments for many of the listed offenses which previously would have the land vomit them out, now being punishable by death in most examples. ~

There is some rather interesting area for further study within these lines, given it is deemed offensive for any man or woman to have intercourse of any sort sexually, with an animal. Topically speaking and from the perspective of modern knowledge, that isn't very complicated to understand - but as a person considers the common human tendency to liken themselves to some animal persona - it then becomes a bit more involved. Especially considering the long relationship symbolically of sovereigns and animal representations - i.e. The Lion Hearted for instance. ~

Socially speaking, this then presents another facet of the church and state rivalry given most governing bodies in sovereign structures did (some still do) liken themselves to said animal representations of themselves. Further within a social sense and within these divisions as presented, it suggests perhaps a line of division in said societies as well? Further suggesting said sovereign element being as exclusive as is the divisions suggested from the direction of religion - between the two.

This then presenting even further conflict within the perception in which both religion and said animal association exists when a group of people - particularly those of a religious structure are referred to as a flock. ~

This would then suggest that the only people are those with no affiliation to the sovereign element or the religious element as per metaphoric representations and suggested capacity of existence. ~

In that line of thought then, when applied to modern governing and social structuring and such things as vesting the idea of sovereignty into the people of the United States - it becomes quite intriguing to say the least. almost titillating to consider in metaphoric continuance as is the motion of it - then further being of a larger emulation and/in motion. ~

Even further in this then, is the immediate assumption that such an applied function would remove the presence of people as element. When really, given the other effects of the design from what I can tell - within and of that body of populous - it actually (within this example reasoning), creates more people in that sense. At least the opportunity to address that combination of human element and animal element - then creating two directions (of sorts) in which the human creature can progress in development. Those being in promoting the progress of human aspects and conversely, the potential for promoting the more animal elemental aspects of/within the human existence (much as I have already addressed concerning the apparent push toward promoting the better human animal instead of the better human).

This combination in social dynamics at least presents the potential of/for social directions pertaining to such. Which seem to be as result of those other effects of neither aspect (religion/sovereign - common) being of primary focus within the presented social mechanism. Which then of course seems to have rendered instead - very herd like social groupings with no consideration for either element of sovereign or religion specifically.

Again, from what I can tell, indicating somewhat of a failure - missed opportunity to maximize human potentials of existence. Somehow having turned a social eco-system of sorts, into that herd like grouping aspect... which again, very much resembles the tendencies of animals. ~

Topically perceived then, in order not to violate these religious dictations pertaining to people and animal sexual intercourse - it looks to be the only option in seeing ones self and their mate as some form of animal - which then suggests that our existence, our very selves within that tendency of being human - employ a mimicry of sorts if not being out right psychological lyconthropes. Even without conscious effort. ~

This having been done from what I can tell, through populating a rather brilliant design of people having been vomited out of other countries. Again, I see at least the design of a social eco-cycle of sorts. Very much in emulation of a larger process and even more than in a metaphoric, metaphysical sense. ~

To some concern though - perhaps even frightening to some degree - the association with animal persona - through such transference and symbolism - then makes possible the aspect of human sacrifice no longer being representative of human sacrifice. ~

As well, within the saturation of said historic animal association, it makes committing murder all the more difficult within that same reasoning - making it then necessary in regard to such writ, to find the proper area within that cycle and sea of lyconthropes - to effectively commit such an offense. Essentially negating the extremes of such rules and relegating the larger body of decision making to that body of populous. Effectively suspending an area of existence which is then neither one extreme or the other.

A result of an social - architectural effect in some sense through the design and use of that idea called representative democracy. ~

Again, perhaps a happenstance (as per our common perspective) emulation and living metaphor of existence itself - of our capacity and perceived understanding as it ebbs and flows. Progresses and retracts - and sometimes, simultaneously. Representing in a living sense, that aspect of human existence which is being suspended between all other examples of life here - and something else that we as a species continue to bemuse and befuddle ourselves with, even today. ~

Studies In Theology - 10/13/2006 (Dishonest Measure)

2006-11-29T12:12:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 10/13/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/13/2006

Continuing in Leviticus 19 - This seems as though it is a re-visitation of sorts in addressing the limitations introduced as per the commandments and issues concerning sacrifice. ~

There is an inconsistency in this early passage of 19:06, which can easily be seen as a progressive aspect demonstrating perhaps a level of achieved consistency - that being the instruction to now consider left overs from sacrifices being unclean on the Third day.

At this point it is apparently all right to consume the food products the day of, and now the day after said preparations - where consuming them the day after had previously been forbidden in similar decree. ~

Again, this perhaps indicating a developed progress of sorts. ~

This series of instructions then diverges into un mentioned areas as of yet, being in 19:09, the instruction for harvesting crops - which further indicates more progress in a social sense. ~ Even more so in the specific instructions of leaving some of the harvest for the poor and foreigners living among them. Indicating a definite development in the social atmosphere. ~

This while still under Mose's charge. ~

Still further is indication of considerable social advance within the instructions to pay hired workers on time, honesty pertaining to legal matters, and again a recognition of both rich and poor apparently within their own ranks. ~

This all before reaching their destination. ~

There is a specific decree I find some further interest in beyond common courtesy aspects - this being the instruction NOT to mate two different kinds of animals - which in our modern day is an obvious non starter being no success widely known as possible in such attempts (outside of a laboratory). In the stated instruction is indication in that point in time of much different potential outcome of/in result of said mating. ~

Then is the instructions not to plant two different kinds of seed in the same field - presumably as per the suggested risks of mutation apparently in mating two different kinds of animals, though having to do with vegetables obviously. ~

It then instructs not to wear clothes of two different kinds of thread, which then definitely gives pause for many directions of thought while suggesting immediately an unacknowledged association between perhaps, known results from mixing animate things; animals, vegetables.... in that inherent human tendency previously explored. A superstition perhaps in extending, transcending the physical and physiological? ~

This, as with the other instructions being said to have come from the lord through Moses - perhaps then, in the direction of consistent belief, suggesting a lack of differentiation between living animals (things) and objects? ~

Continuing then in 19:26, it is instructed not to practice fortune telling or witchcraft. ~

This is quite odd at a first glance given that less than three chapters ago, lots were cast to make a decision - such having been and still being a common practice in various forms of said. ~

As stated, this seems immediately contradictory - but on further consideration the purpose it may serve is again a form of concentrated focus - the grasping of attention - on established consistency which further enforces a hierarchical structure. ~

If it is that none within the general populous can (or do) practice such divination - then it is that only a certain area of that society does so. This causes obvious effects as per social dependence and structure, and further then as per focus of belief - may even serve a deeper purpose in removing a disbursed effect - replacing it with a single source of information, so to speak. ~

In 19:35, I see one of the first references to doing good business in this body of work - being an instruction grouped with others; Not to use dishonest measure.

This further then demonstrates an obvious social advance through indicating established commerce and standards. ~

Quite remarkable for transient people being recently former slaves! ~

A note as per concern with two different types of animals mating as further thought; As stated, this suggests a more susceptible physical reality than what we see as normal. further, it very much corroborates several aspects of the present idea of process (and motion) within Proximity Gestation. further yet, it substantiates however slightly, the speculation I have presented pertaining to a progression from a more sensitive time - tending toward our direction of solidifying. this meaning that our connection with other living aspects of existence was perhaps at one time incredibly sensitive. Consider the ability to instill a change physically 9within ones surroundings) with consistent mood, emotion even thought? this of course referring to a point in time far beyond our recorded history. ~

In considering such a possible direction in progression, is drawn easily as similar to that progression of concept into application/realization. Becoming more firm (our physical realm) as it transcends from one to the other. ~

When this is applied to that speculative developmental direction within reality in a larger sense - it poses the possibility of everything eventually becoming entirely firmed. As noted previously, things like trees no longer growing - even that things may no longer even appear to age (for some time) - being within that continuous firming. Then eventually even petrify in some respect as per assertion and speculation.

Definitely an amusing and interesting thought - then giving even more importance to the concept(s) of progressive corruptions, instead of magnified solidification's. ~

Studies In Theology - 10/12/2006 (continued) "United Penitentiary of America?"

2006-11-27T08:13:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 10/12/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/12/2006 (continued)

Further in Leviticus - third book, chapter 18, it begins to give instructions relating to the act of sexual relations with family members. As if the obvious aspects of incest haven't been learned in our modern day as per procreation - this chapter seems to stand as representative of a time when such knowledge was just becoming known. ~

I find a level of interest in the manner in which things are described - as per 18:7 in Leviticus for instance, It states that sex with ones own mother is a violation of ones father. ~

Having sexual relations with ones own grand daughter is said to violate ones self. ~

Sex with a daughter-in-law isn't stated as being a violation of one's son, but only that she is the sons wife. ~

Sex with one's own brother's wife, is said to be a violation of one's brother. ~

It states not to marry one's own wifes sister (though multiple wives were very much common), because they would then be rivals. ~

It states that sex with a neighbors wife would defile one's own self. ~

The manner of perceived violation in these instances is perhaps something for further study. It suggests a pattern of perception which may prove interesting. Not to mention the more modern social aspects of promoting everyone as brother and sister symbolically.

It then goes on to describe that those having lived in such a manner - as to be driven out. Vomited as it notes specifically, out of the land before you. ~

Again I see, if even through the course of social development and the effect in the saturation of such structures as is Christianity (being wide spread and of a considerably old line), a relation with the effect in result as is a refugee.

Then further with the early expunging of un-desirables from several countries within human social development, then being welcomed into the design of our early representative democracy. ~

Beyond this suggesting our nation to be one of moral and ethical destitution - this substantiates further, the metaphor I have presented pertaining to the governing design - again, if only as result in a given plateau sort of culmination between several social structures - their individual developments (socially and ideologically), and the resonating effects of said saturations already in existence - then producing as a result of interaction within the structure design, the result of that larger process applied, in a social sense. ~

Further, in the welcomed use as per populous being those having been vomited out of other countries, it illustrates the design as per progressive corruptions within what we know of this version of representative democracy. I might even argue further that in light of such, it stands as further corroboration to said metaphoric symbolism as per the idea of Christ - and more especially so in the realization of said cyclical eco-cycle of the crucifixion transference I have briefly noted. ~

More directly, the larger motion within representative democracy as per said Christ qualities in comparison - then further emulates such with that use of those un-wanted elsewhere. Those having been unwanted elsewhere, then representing the strength and connection within the hypothetical (symbolic) transference with/from/of the idea of Christ and all others having been crucified - but, as is widely known pertaining to the idea of Christ and crucifixion - in no way exclusively. ~

Citizens within the representative democracy are seen (supposedly) as equals - again, most having been uwanted in other countries. All within the governed and simultaneously governing body of said structure, supposedly being as much a part of the governing process (and therefore, body) as they are governed. Illustrating another aspect of that transference in symbolism between the idea of Christ and all others having been crucified within that area and context.

Essentially, within that consistency and consideration - being seen as each and the other. ~

Again suggesting that it is very much up to the populous as to the desired resulting social atmosphere.

This isn't to say that I think we are all Jesus H. Christ (or any other name/version) by any means. More that there is a notable comparison - as symbolism and metaphoric transference goes. ~

As well, this is not meant to suggest a limitation as per specific ideology - especially in regard to many of the earlier reasons for the establishment of such a social/governing structure - only to perhaps suggest a source of the earlier perceived Liberations and potentials within such an application. ~

Studies In Theology - 10/12/2006 (Eat It Or Wear It Comparison & Transference Exploration)

2006-11-26T12:20:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity 10/12/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/12/2006

In Leviticus 17, blood is again stressed of importance - even to the degree of being criminal to sacrifice anywhere but the Tabernacle.

To be guilty of blood - translated as murder. ~

This is in regard to the sacrifice of animals and obviously not in regard to the task of hunting - which of course is scarcely mentioned beyond earlier references to Essau (almost specifically). Such itself then indicating a more cultivating sort of nomadic tendency - given a person can imagine such. Though, just as obviously, the Israelites consisted mostly of herders - and as mentioned, at this point - still nomadic herders, at that. ~

It is further described that this rule is to prevent sacrifices in the open fields and to insure that those sacrifices be brought to the priest at the place of worship.

It then refers to them loosely as peace offerings. ~

This is particularly interesting to me, given the common understanding of peace offering - where a person considering it with reason might know it to be an effort in appeasing a want for a continued peace, most commonly this term suggests and is interpreted as making peace with something. As if to have been at considerable odds with the recipient. Offering the token to amend so to speak. ~

From a more analytical perspective, a person begins to see some greater consistency in the mandate of only at the place of worship - given then the consistent spattering of blood against the altar and of course the burning which is commonly stated as being a pleasant aroma to the "Lord." ~

This consistency set considerable importance on very physical attributes in comparison to the idea of an omnipotent being. "Aroma" and further the concentrated area being insisted upon for blood letting. Both are very physical aspects - well within physical reality.

This suggests perhaps other aspects of the relationship - but most definitely suggests an effort of concentrating such physical points of interest (and focus) in a confined - though movable area. ~

This then being reinforced with things such as exile as punishment. Noting such sacrifices elsewhere as being to goat demons - goat idols. ~

As per the earlier ceremony of sending the sins of the Israelites into the wilderness on a goat, this then suggests quite a bit - as well as posing a slight contradiction which again suggests a sort of devils due aspect. ~

it also suggests and reinforces the idea of multiple influences perceived in that single focal point as deity. ~

11/26/2006 As a thought as I read back over these notes while transposing them... what of the idea that perhaps all which is set forward in those early books of the bible, is an account of a learning experience as it played out? Perhaps those years in the wilderness were as much in the effort to establish some conducive consistency before the attempt at a greater level of civilization, as much as it was in the more topical aspect of "following the Lord" as it has been described and understood within popular culture?

In considering the mounting consistencies and of course those intertwining aspects, a person could speculate that such was/is the case in regard to those earlier years just out of Egypt. Finding their footing so to speak, with a concept and idea that was admittedly new to just about everyone - especially in regard to the nomadic aspect of a single point of worship.

Definitely something to explore in future years.

As a speculative note in applying common logic into the regard of such influences - if it were that a body of multiple influences existed - much as most other religious structures depict as in plural - then further if it were a base effort to appease certain appetites of these entities through the various forms of sacrifice (which also appear in most all other religious structures of the time period) - then it stands to reason that such mandate would also be in an effort to influence those influences through the concentration and sort of quarantine pertaining to one place said sustenance could be available for that plurality in regard to this body of people and method. ~

"Herding" those influences so to speak.

Coaxing a single focal point as it seems to be. Then symbolically providing only tainted examples - being the scape goat for instance - for those other (goat demons) not complying (conducive) to those efforts of such concentration. ~ A sort of eat it or wear it in regard to those perceived existing influences. ~

This then adds yet another interesting facet to the idea of divulging, confessing ones transgressions.

As presented previously - What of the dynamic which is created in disclosing said sins to obviously non-acceptable deities?

As per Catholicism, this then adds an interesting light to that suggested relation to Aaron's role, and that of other priests - given of course the action of having sent sin into the wilderness as well.

Is it not then plausible that the act of confession is just as similar to the divulging of ones transgressions

as is suggested with the use of the scape goat, as it could be seen in relation to those efforts for atonement?

Is even Aaron and his line then, not so dissimilar in some respects from the scape goat in that they both act to remove the sins of the people through containing them of their own (though Aaron possessed a medallion in which to place them)? ~

In this line of thought, I happen upon another point of interest to myself, though pertaining more to the idea of "Christ" - and as well in some consistency regarding apparent contradictions between old and new testaments. Initially the contradiction being that the earlier efforts definitely look to be efforts at said concentration of a multiple - where as pertaining to the idea of "Christ," there is - through the same (similar) symbolic relationship in and of similarities - i.e. Aaron being anointed in a particular manner, then further anointing others in the same way (an unmistakable transference, so to speak) - with "Christ" being crucified.

Quite literally as is most commonly known - the number of people which the Romans crucified was rather large.

I do not believe that there exists an accurate count given the degree to which they (Romans) employed that means of execution. ~

In that same symbolic relationship then (transference so to speak), it is obvious - given the consistent method of that form of execution (crucifixion) - that a polarization of sorts, then occurs within that concentrated focus and consistently applied method in and of similarly applied transference - dilating it so to speak - more so, displacing it. Perhaps then presenting a cyclical - ecocycle of sorts - even further in relation symbolically as per sin with both Aaron and the scape goat tactic? ~

It most definitely at least suggests some further relation, given then the example in commonality within the same idea (transference) of the existence of 12 disciples. And further yet, it would not surprise me to find a direct relationship between those 12 disciples and the previous Tribes of Israel. ~

The inversion this then presents concerning that concentration is rather interesting. More so the cycle of relationships which presents the potential dynamic. ~

The consideration of said symbolism in crucifixion and that aspect of dissipation in applied transference with all who were crucified symbolically - further gives interest in the comparison I have presented between the idea of "Christ" and our representative democracy - yet again, if only it is a matter of course as result of the overwhelming social influence of such lines of/in belief.

"Multiple" representations being symbolic of both aspects - Governed and Governing - both then being one and the other in regard to the comparison and applied transference extended to such applications, symbolically. ~

Studies In Theology - 10/10/2006

2006-11-25T13:05:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -10/10/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/10/2006

As I read back over most recent notes, I realize that I inadvertently didn't mention another interesting aspect in reference to priest examinations.

Though the reference seems obviously about "discoloration" near an infection - it still is an interesting thing that any yellow hair found on or near a sore, is considered indicative of a more serious illness perhaps, where it is mentioned that black hair growing on such a scab indicates having been healed. ~

This is referenced in Leviticus 13:32. ~

The interesting aspect being in possible misinterpretation to indicate blonde hair signifying illness while black hair seemingly signifies having been healed.

These passages also indicate as addressed pertaining to apparent transformation as per albino, other suggested possible transformations - mostly in hair color. In some instances it is described that certain coloration changes of hair are still not suggestive of further infection in regard to example skin disorders. ~

I then find this more interesting as per transformation possibilities in the description of Moses having seemed to age at Mt. Sinai after being in the presence of "The Lord" - this being popularly understood and perceived through a rapid hair coloration change. ~

As speculation, this then suggests that a given presence which influenced said transformations, is likewise similar to that which influenced apparent skin disorders - some of which even resulting in a complete transformation as in the albino description. ~

This then suggests yet further, aspects of proximity and those multiple aspects I have explored in description. ~

It may even be reckoned that perhaps God in perception was only the presence and activity of micro organisms?

11/24/2006 This of course then being influenced through the use of the slaughter aspects in sacrificial ceremonies - being that the promotion of micro-organism activity then concentrates with such activities in a confined area. Further then, it would be that only certain types of such activity would be promoted with consistent application of certain types of offering. In considering the consistency used to cure certain proteins and to make cheese in the modern day - this sort of exploration is in no way unfounded - Though it is that I should state that such exploration is NO attempt to negate the properties of that larger motion. Only that perhaps the manifestation of such POSSIBLE activities as "cause" - then acts as a representation in emulation of that larger motion and influence - an indicator as it were, in relation to that given example "motion." ~

As yet another note, I find it at least interesting that Moses underwent such transformation where it is that others, previously mentioned as having had correspondence with "The Lord" in close quarters - DID NOT. Again, such indicates a multiple aspect - even in a "cause and effect" sense - meaning that only certain aspects of and within that larger influence resulted in such transformation, while other aspects of "it" resulted in different influential outcomes.

For the sake of argument, I would even contend that such diversity in similar effects, (as noted) represents that larger process in/and motion - beyond the topically perceived micro organism explanation. ~

Even scientifically reasoned, different organisms exist in different (however subtle) areas so to speak - different parameters. ~

This isn't to contend that God on the mountain as is widely believed, is simply a germ (body of germs). Such is no more plausible in my mind than is the more popular burning bush analogy having something to do with what amounts to a peep show. It is only to draw comparison to that which is described as acceptable transformation as per similar bodily effects, and that which is said to have transpired on Mt. Sinai - Which, as stated, then again indicates a plurality within a larger consistency - which and what ever a person chooses to see being that which it represents. ~

It is hard to imagine a micro-organism in existence today, which has any such effect (and especially to such extremes) - which then suggests perhaps a physiological change-corruption of the atmosphere and human species since the time of those instructions for priests to perform as examinations. ~

Very interesting combination of comparisons. Perhaps something else to pursue in my more mature years? ~

Reading further in Leviticus - 16:08. It depicts that Aaron is to cast lots in order to decide which of two goats is to be sacrificed, and which is to be sent into the wilderness bearing the sins of the people. ~

This of course represents the use of scape goat quite literally - after the casting of lots which I see as rather interesting, being a remnant of previous forms of worship based entirely within the multiple deity structure(s). Such was quite common in many multiple deity structures as a form of represented communication through interpretation. ~

Further I see this as interesting given that Aaron's (and his line) duties are described as taking the sins of the people upon himself (themselves) - more directly, upon the medallion of gold on his head dress. ~

Again in reference to the scape goat - it is an interesting point that the sins of the people were to be sent happenstance into the wilderness. ~

the medallion, in the state of being a medallion -obviously - represents a sort of responsibility in containment, where the scape goat - again rather obviously - doesn't. Actually quite to the contrary. ~

Further something that I find particularly interesting about this action, is in and of, thus far - the pronounced concerns with burning things seen as impure - as to purify them. ~

What of the natural food chain?

Does this then have deeper symbolism in allowing the possible spread of said sins in potential consumption and introduction to the food chain? ~

This further given the importance even only thus far, with eating and meals, symbolically. ~

11/24/2006 Perhaps this suggests a larger eco-cylce being attempted as employ? Perhaps it is symbolic of the "devils due?" Quite odd in a symbolic aspect - in the release of those sins, so to speak. If nothing more than in the regard of a sort of "dirty laundry" aspect.

Studies In Theology - 10/09/2006 (continued)

2006-11-24T09:10:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -10/09/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/09/2006 (continued)

Reading further now; In Leviticus 10:08, it is said that the "Lord" speaks to Aaron - essentially telling him not to be a drunk priest - then continuing to state it is their job to distinguish between "sacred" and "common" - "un-clean" and "clean." Further then that it is their job to teach the Israelites all decrees given them through Moses. ~

This is the very same Aaron that fashioned the "golden Calf." ~

Obviously an example of a "forgiven" though rather considerable transgression. ~

I find some interest in this decree of teaching the Israelites. ~

It suggests then that such teaching may have become subject to whims given the sizable transgression in the Golden Calf incident. Further in consideration was Aaron's willingness to do the bidding of the Israelites. ~

Kind of a mischievous giggle in such considerations!

In a deeper consideration it presents other potentials within these considerations, if considered as per by design.

As speculation, who is it to say that the potentials of further diversions wasn't accounted for in the ordination and maintenance of Aaron (and his line) remaining priests with such a role? ~

This speculation is beyond "devils due" so to speak, and may pertain to avoidance of over applied limitations while maintaining a consistency.

Perhaps if even by happenstance as per human tendency - then manifesting as emulation with their "movement (nomadic tendency)" and of the larger motion, as well. ~

As another interesting point this aspect foreshadows a considerable amount of the directions and actions depicted pertaining to both "Christ" and the idea of "Christ." Though much in "Christs" actions were in purposeful dissension, where what is suggested with retaining Aaron in such a position, is more an idea of/in a subtler sense - if considering human tendency and "past performance."

Such direction within such a line of thought, definitely would suggest an effort to maintain a "lucidity" of sorts - with a consistency tending toward a certain level of dissension. Which I might state, is again seeming to be an emulation of our larger existence. ~

In Leviticus 13:12, it is described that the priest perform slight health examinations in addition to and as a part of their priestly duties - something I find personally interesting is in regard to diagnosing skin "disease (even leprosy)."

The intriguing aspect is in the description of potential "disease" effecting the entire body, turning it white.

If open sores appear - if open sores then heal and turn white, as well - this is seen and pronounced as "clean." ~

This indicates a form of "albino" in many ways - but is described as more than possible, perhaps even quite common as a transition.

Such is never even suggested as occurring in modern societies - being a transition in such an extreme.

This suggests some pretty incredible potential within the human species.

It even corroborates that larger process and a more pronounced level of interaction with it in such a transition.

Modern albino's are very much as such from birth, if not even through the gestation period - in modern society. ~

Such a transition is at least intriguing. Especially those not related to the affliction known as leprosy - which commonly in that day and age, did not result in a state of existence which could be pronounced as "clean."

It very much suggests the presence of other elemental capacities and consistencies.

Of further interest is the description of "infection" being "un-clean." This is relative to some degree as per many instances regarding areas of potential micro-organism activity. Especially given the ceremonial instances where certain foods are not to be consumed - further are other foods which are not to be consumed after having been set, exposed all night. ~

Even more interesting is the regard specifically to live yeast in certain instances. ~

In Leviticus 14:14, a ceremony to purify someone - or group of people, is described as very similar to that which was done to anoint Aaron as high priest. symbolically then, this presents some interesting possibilities as per "relation" in that sense - much in regard to those aspects I have mentioned in an association sort of manner. As much as in those mentioned pertaining to an extended - suggestion of being part of "sacrifice" as said extension, presumably due to symbolic relativity - but even further in a manner as is atonement through the idea of "Christ." ~

Being associated with Aaron, the high priest himself - as per said "anointing" in a cleansing ceremony, then suggests a similar affiliation through that association - that of having been "absolved." ~

It also poses a curious aspect as per symbolic "recognition" vicariously as well. ~

Yet another interesting consistency in symbolism, is the common action of priests to sprinkle a given substance seven times at the altar - most times in the presence of those seeking atonement.

As mentioned, though as of yet to pass at this point in this work - a prominent symbol - being the Star of David - contains seven enclosures. In considering the tribes of Israel as they are "paired off" within certain configurations already explored to some degree - and of course considering the tribe of Levite - this then amounts to seven points of enumeration as well.

As a note - I delve a bit further into such apparent consistencies while examining the next book - being the Book Of Numbers.

Though I am sure that there is some relation in significance - I am not as of yet possessing exact or otherwise information as per said significance beyond the obvious which I can readily discern. ~

Further it then mentions discharge and intercourse as "un-clean" - then presenting things to do to again cleanse (purify) ones self after such activities. In this area I find somewhat of a chide in the closing - stating to the fact (emphasized, no less) that the Israelites must perform these tasks to cleanse themselves - or they will die for their impurity.

Given that much of these instructions seem directed as much at better hygiene as any other reason - and further within the context and emphasis in which they were issued - the Israelites must have been having one heck of a party! ~

Studies In Theology - 10/09/2006 - "Atonement" - Food Service Exploration

2006-11-20T15:09:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -10/09/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/09/2006

After thinking more in the directions of the recent exploration, I then consider the developments regarding consistencies as are "chain restaurants" and other similar sort of development (socially as well as commerce in the food service industry). ~

This direction within the line of thought as pers said "case of reconciliation (atonement)" so to speak - looks as though it leads to a similar result as even the consistencies having developed within the "movement (nomadic)" aspect which I have described. That "overconsistency" (more through the saturation of consistencies) then seems to render that difference as per "motion" and the developed modern "stationary" result.

Even related, if you will, to that tendency between "concpet" and "realization."

The possibility of becoming overtly "stationary (stagnant)" then becomes more prominent. ~

Seperate establishments - a variety so to speak (that itself as a body, does not reach a polarization in the other extreme) within this exploratory example - seems as though it would preserve some element of perceived "motion" (though in an inverted sense) and further maintain the benefits of such social health - in a "variety" sense so to speak. ~

It is easily observed within the progression of such establishments (as they have developed - and continue to exist) that some influences as per, are unavoidable.

Further, even as a social resonation, it is a plausible observation - again in reference to serving such a purpose whether intentional as per said social development - or not though again as a form of social development (lack of intention to such "atonement designs" being more efficient in such service within my opinion).

As I have touched on, such establishments began as "Inns," then to "Pubs" and "Inns," then on to "Restaurants".. then further to large "chain establishments." this of course as development from even the common house hold meal in many instances - and letting out rooms for shelter to travelers.

COMPARATIVE EXPLORATION - FOOD SERVICE/ATONEMENT STUDY NOTES EXPLORING COMMON COMPLIANCE WITH "ATONEMENT" IN OUR MODERN DAY FURTHER FOOD SERVICE EXAMPLE DEMONSTRATING RELATION

I should stress that I am of the opinion of that which tends to see over limitation - the over amplification of limitations (consistency for example) to be where efficiency begins to wain in the sense of total result. that itself, in my opinion, is a form of polarization (to the detrimental degree) and dilution - though somewhat inverted from total lack of continuity. Definitely more the over saturation of applied limitations pertaining to this example and other social aspects. ~

Though I DO NOT attach such service industry establishments to such a purpose (as I have addressed), I am rather pleased with the general observation and comparison - again, if pertaining to nothing more than the social development of "civilization." this in knowing the influence over centuries of development on society itself from the direction of such ideologies. ~

"Superstition" and "worship" have been of the human creature (as has ceremony) - much as reason for development in many cases - since recorded history. ~

Most early accounts of humanity are only as result of said purposes, themselves. ~

I am still intrigued with the contradiction within this "writ" and ideology/theology - pertaining to wine. (for other reasons beyond those I have addressed in other places - such as the availability of wine in that time period). I do lean personally, as per my over all intention, that the considerably slight transgression mentioned in "Leviticus" of "blood" - is encompassed as well through said slight transgression symbolically, within the idea of "Christ." This meaning that the symbolic consumption of "blood" pertaining to "Christ" is no longer a transgression regarding the earlier standards - in so many words, that itself falls under the "wage" which was "paid" within the idea of "Christ."

I suppose what I am saying here, is that within the design of the idea of "Christ," is the direction to provide path to "atonement" - as opposed to an effort in establishing some separation - some discord within the entirety of the work through the example use of symbolism pertaining to "blood."

Further, I do not believe that said benefit is only for those purposefully drinking wine to symbolize "blood."

In my opinion, such was "taken care of" so to speak, along with other perceived transgressions within that idea of "Christ" and said actions.

I am aware that it is entirely possible to construe such a direction as purposeful digression away from earlier dictation pertaining to such... but I cannot see the reasoning behind a presumed attempt in that line of thought, to render one of the most common beverages of the time a sort of violation itself in attaching such symbolism to it. I should state that I can also see a sort of oddity in the leading of such beliefs into the direction of symbolized cannibalism. But again, within the context of the reported actions within that idea of "Christ," I do not believe that such was intended to be understood as cannibalism... more so, in my opinion, it was intended to be seen as partaking of an established "policy" so to speak which was meant to render the tendencies of humanity no longer a detriment to themselves - given of course that humans are "born of sin" and further, are quite clumsy in an everyday sense pertaining to such as would be seen compliance with some rather complicated standards.

In essence, as I have observed, the direction of such symbolism then rendered the potentials within human existence to either establish a sort of heaven on Earth, or conversely given our innate tendencies, a hellish existence as we clamber along. From my perspective, such was meant to "liberate" the human potential as opposed to inhibit.

I feel I should again note a slight personal pleasure as per my own perspective within these observations recently- my career having been that of the culinary. I can even see perhaps, with amusement, that such (as is the "atonement aspect") may have been where menu items came from. A "better variety" for atonement so to speak - more so - more diverse choices being available from establishment to establishment, that is to say. making then, for more popular establishments - especially given the tendencies of humans toward corruptions, and consequently transgressions.

Really kind of a giggle.

Further this then makes sense to me given my opinion on the larger motion lending to various "individualism's."

In context of this exploration - different people would desire/require different forms of/for "atonement."

I just find some level of amusement in approaching the design of a menu - something I have done quite a bit - even dish's/menu items - from a perspective of "offering" to be purchased for "atonement." Just kind of a tickle so to speak. ~

This aspect even then illustrates further, the less efficiency in such directions of the over consistent (manufactured, even) sort of establishments which pose little variety and accommodation to individual "needs," desires. ~

Again, so as not to digress - it does make sense that accommodation would remain important - variety and choice so to speak - as per an individuals present "desires," which of course in my perspective stem from that larger interaction and influence which in context of this example, could be seen as an indicator as per their "needs" for said "atonement" - given the example of said interaction. ~

this then would suggest that "appetite" and a given craving so to speak, is in relation to that interaction.

"If something looks good - piques the appetite - perhaps is craved as nourishment" - perhaps then it is as much to rectify a larger imbalance within said interaction, as it is within our more topical interpretations of "pleasure" and "want."

This is, yet again, my own exploratory though in and of direction. I am in no way insisting that any sort of rigid limitations be applied to such an incredible human experience as is a meal. But I have to be honest with myself in such observations - even if it is some rather "funny" stuff.

"Funny" in a rather pleasing and consoling manner for many reasons - another of which being that it illustrates the development of the human species, and how much else as potential there must be to someday find, beyond the existing direction and conditioned influences. ~

I may never see or experience them, and it isn't necessarily that what is, is displeasing. Only that within said observable consistencies is the fact that in a larger sense, they represent only a form of said "limitations," which then means as per the consistency - that we have yet to experience other "directions" in many ways. ~

Bon Appetite!

Studies In Theology - 10/08/2006 (continued) - "Atonement" - Food Service Exploration

2006-11-17T13:47:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -10/08/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/08/2006 (continued)

Reading on in Leviticus, it becomes apparent in chapter 2 that even through the obvious and intentional transgressions performed by Aaron as per fashioning a false idol, that his family line remained priests attending the altar and performing ritual tasks. ~

I see this as quite strange given the severity and actions other, even more subtle transgressions held for other members of the tribes of "Israel." Some even cursed to non-existence so to speak.

But here, in the face of intentional deviation from the "deliverers" wants, the blood line of Aaron still remained as priests. ~

This then causes thoughts in comparison with the modern role of priests even in the Catholic denomination of "Christianity."

It is as though they act as an insulator between "followers" and that which is perceived to be.

The act of confession and gaining atonement from the "priest," then being similar to a form of utilizing that which is indicated of Aaron to be - as per a symbolic, ongoing sacrifice so to speak. At the very least, being seen as the bearer of such offerings in being anointed with the blood of them, and further being associated with such offerings as are derived from grain. ~

This is definitely a point of interest given the considerable transgression - then further the apparent continued capacity of such a "blood line."

Perhaps even an element of "I won't tell if you don't?" ~

In regard again to "sacrifice," then further in regard to the idea of limited areas of the entire work as focus - what then to do in that line of thought, within the urban setting, to appease those focused areas of repetition within the whole of the work? ~

I surely cannot be alone in seeing the absurdity of such deliberate extremes of limitation in focus as being the "four bar" example?

There aren't any goats or sheep, or any other live stock for that matter - in the urban setting.

Further, those presenting such sacrifices very much then consumed that which they presented, as well as that which wasn't.

If the entirety of the work isn't considered as a whole, then such would bring to rise a need for more rural settings to maintain a compliance with those earlier books. Unless of course those applied mimicry's, including perhaps cannibalism - perhaps even then "Satanism" (through fictive transfer) were then employed over the years as a form of compliance? ~

Further in Leviticus, I find some rather interesting passages to various forms of atonement - which of course then relate to the idea of "Christ" then representing atonement for all transgressions - it is described that a person not having a sacrifice of their own, may purchase one for some infractions - this again being before the sacrifice of "Christ" for all. ~

In Leviticus 5:16 the monetary exchange is described which purchases an allotment of the sacrifice in atonement for transgression against "sacred properties." ~

I personally see rather interesting (though exploratory in the interest of just that) possible connections as per social symbolism. Even in having possibly been developed as per the course of society - but perhaps having no true, immediate connection beyond that coinciding development.

The "price" is stated as being the "loss incurred" plus twenty (20) percent. ~

I am personally intrigued with this (and mildly amused at the thought) given my knowledge of the food service industry.

Twenty (20) percent is roughly a common average as per "profit margin." Though it varies a little from place to place - that is in the neighborhood of percentage "mark up." ~

Granted, rather unfounded beyond my personal exploration - but amusing in the same sense as per existing consistencies in "resonation." ~

As I consider it, and further consider the various forms of offerings - the idea of modern restaurant settings fulfilling such requirements (symbolically) is really no more absurd than insisting the directions of various other imposed mimicry's have any substantial weight. In fact, such a setting very much seems as it would be a much more efficient form of said applied "mimicry" with far fewer detrimental limitations - especially in the more "free form" settings where product is designed and prepared from scratch on the premises. ~

EXPLORATORY COMMENTARY - FOOD SERVICE/ATONEMENT

This isn't to say that I feel such establishments should be as such. Only that, through the similar reasoning's as other forms in said mimicry - they (restaurants) pose a rather efficient area for effortless compliance. Further as should be readily evident in my personal opinion, "efforts" toward such would prove far less efficient than through applied living and interest in the trade itself. If only because of a heightened sensitivity to that larger motion as it exists - inadvertently employing it through focus on one specific aspect - metaphorically and with no intention to "comply" - within and of said trade. ~

Further such an "ignorant" approach removes the limitations of it - enabling a shared aspect in the existing layers of society and existence. Through not applying said limitations (in effort to comply with some religion) in specific intent - there are no limitations as per desired results and further as per perceived meaning.

A person could partake as per their personal perception, as well as those even being oblivious to any even remote similarities with such "atonement." One in no way then transgressing against the other. Until of course concerted effort is applied in making such an association prominent. ~

Most definitely another area where-in the use of applied ignorance could be rather efficient it would seem. ~

"Compliance" through simple, productive existence - if even with no intention on such designs. Most definitely as it would seem, being simply as a matter of course in existence at this point.

Something of the sort then on further consideration - pertaining to ease of/in compliance through simple existence - Then actually being as a desired result of the initial intention of such writ and limitations, to begin with. Especially beyond the introduction of the idea of "Christ."

This even further supporting the observation of the "government in design," having perhaps been a metaphor as per the idea of "Christ." A form of "automation" if you will that is far beyond that of the machines and said imposed limitations.... and again, simply as a matter of course in utilizing simple existence. ~

Again, this only being observation from my personal perspective - and further, obviously, only in regard to the present ideology and exploration of subject matter. ~

I do find another incredibly interesting point of seeming contradiction being in Leviticus 3:17, stating and forbidding the consumption of blood. ~

Then, in considering again the "folding points" of similarity I have explored in description - this rests in an interesting manner with "Christ" having presented wine symbolically as "blood," specifically to be consumed - suggesting then, that contradiction. But again being a "point of contact" in regard to "folding points" of said intersecting - as with the examples of un-leavened bread and even wine in other instances. ~

Essentially in reading Leviticus, it denotes the various forms of offerings in atonement of "sin." ~

Those then are essentially compiled with the introduction of and within the idea of "Christ." ~

Within that act of "compiling" so to speak, is then the presumed use in transaction for all to partake of such atonement's easily. ~

A rather interesting direction of thought if I do say so, myself. Again, if only as result of developed influences on the structure of society and further if even in a happenstance manner as per confinement in our reality. ~

It is again stated that the consumption of blood will result in any of the "people of Israel" who do so, being cut off from the community. Perhaps then, with "Christ" having made the association of "wine" and "blood," such was intended as a line of division sot to speak - even given the common accessibility of wine in that day.

This presents the aforementioned contradiction - to sup of wine as sustenance is no transgression for the "People of Israel," to do so in the symbolism of blood - for atonement - immediately then seems to become such - BUT, within the presented meaning in use, it is then atonement for all transgressions (sins) - including, I would imagine, that seemingly small transgression in such applied symbolic use. Especially in the light of Aaron remaining in the line of priests, and further then the continued use of such symbolism.

As another observation given recent changes in the Catholic church no longer using wine, but instead substituting fruit juice in such ceremonies - perhaps there is a larger movement away from focal extremes in use of Christ as a "one stop" for compliance?

As a humorous note, seeing as though there is no livestock in urban areas fit for compliance in such sacrifices, maybe the uncanny and incessant presence of pigeons is of some relation? You find them in every city inhabited by people it seems - and seldom, if at all in the wild! How amusing.

Studies In Theology - 10/08/2006

2006-11-17T12:32:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -10/08/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

10/08/2006

In review thus far of this topical study of the "New Living Translation" of the "Bible" - In a broad sense I see some consistencies which very much corroborate ideas and leanings I have thus far explored.

Within this review as well, I will note the obvious lack of anything which even begins to suggest an association with various forms of popular interpretations - such as with "God" being the vaginal orifice for instance. ~

Something more obvious in regard to such tendencies and belief, is similar to the forms of mimicry a person can find in mutations of "Christian beliefs" in places where such beliefs were forcibly imposed, such as the Bahama Islands.

In those communities it is very obvious that figures and points of focus within such writ and belief structure as is Catholicism for instance, were utilized simply as representation of and with their own belief structure.

Immediately this adaptation served as a defense toward further persecution - and as well demonstrates the use of aposematic mimicry within the human race in regard to ideology - which is rather remarkable (similar things have transpired within the continental United States as well). In the larger sense within longevity and development, the beliefs of the area are great example of the effects within the process of "Proximity Gestation."

Both belief structures are no longer either.

In a real sense they have formed an entirely different belief structure - though still possessing topical remnants of each (and lesser examples involved in the combinations).

Further, this can in no way be categorized as a "linear" development in my belief - the concept of "time" and progression being rather un-pronounced, especially in this given example. In fact, though I have not yet to study it in depth - what I can see of it is a continuing "mutation" which has no set "linear" aspects beyond applied limitations of perception. ~

Further as stated in regard to the similar application of interpretation concerning an overtly "feminine" reference in regard to biblical meaning - such is merely a similar sort of mutation as well. Very much an applied limitation in efforts toward various things - one of which being a sense of control in such a limited association. To confine the idea of such profound concept - such uncontrollable and unimaginably immense ideology as is that contained in the word "God," within something which is decidedly a physical limitation - is in essence and effort, placing it in a controllable instance.

I can see where such serves to facilitate a path to some form of easier understanding, as well - however fictitious in relation to the work itself, not to mention the over all concept. Essentially it is the application on and into a form of applied limitation, itself. ~

11/17/2006 - As a note, such mimicry does serve several purposes in given instances - one of which being to essentially remove the despotic controlling aspect - that is, as long as such use in said forms doesn't itself become forms of despotism in similar ways. Both instances can be cited throughout human history.

Further, there are no references to such a relationship within the work itself - thus far the only minute example in a stretch of the imagination, is the ever popular reference to the "burning bush." The only other vaguery in that sense thus-far even nearing the suggesting of the vaginal orifice as "God," is as has been described in regard to Essau and Jacob, and the deception perpetrated by their mother. ~

As observation, and as noted - it is suggested in various references that there is a "movement" considered in regard to that which is referred to as "God." This then further substantiates the aspect of proximity in relation to that larger process - that larger influence. ~

This is even further substantiated in the beginnings of "Genesis" with the reference to the book of Genesis 1:18. ~

As noted, the celestial bodies are said to have been placed to "govern the day and night." In no complicated terms, those celestial bodies move as does Earth, there-in obviously changing the relationship in proximity. ~

As a personally interesting point of observation - this then works to illustrate the tendencies of humanity as I have noted in other entries - most notably being the contradiction and tendency of trying to "still" that motion. "Contain it" as it were.

This tendency then denotes an inherent inversion of sorts, which is initially attached to our existence - perhaps as per that unique area in which we exist between "animal" and the "cognitive" - It further illustrates both the example of "concept" into "realization" as I have presented it (though in an ongoing sense) - and the tendency toward such within applied (imposed) limitations - more the tendency toward maintaining the retarded progression (never quite embracing it) in realizing that "cusp" beyond limitations - through various applied limitations. ~

The various forms of such interpretation serve also to illustrate the tendency and in-inescapable motion of progressive corruptions - in so many words, literal attempts toward fulfilling such interpretations and even such writ (as per the "limitation" aspects of it - supressive most often, and coupled with some apposed mimicry) are examples of "corruption" through compliance. Even and especially those forms of interpretation which attempt to adhere quite literally, in my opinion. Further especially in regard to the larger motion and proximity effect. ~

While I am not saying that this is either "good" or "bad" in that larger sense - it is quite truthfully that through the efforts in being "good," the results are still a form of "corruption." ~

Again I will note that such writ is itself a form of applied limitation - as are all other examples of such firmness - this is not being "good" of "bad" per say, but only factual. Especially in regard to said idea of "God." ~

Odd that it seems a great concern to solidify such limitations - even in the very factual relation they describe in motion. ~

Again I cite the "reflective" nature of this belief structure and the majority of others from the same time period and even before - being "multiple" and given to proximity in a set and firm placement - this one again however, illustrates "movement" with a singular point of reference. Even in designing a movable place of worship - rather unique. ~

In beginning to read the book of Leviticus - it is a pronounced and noticeable consistency regarding the sacrifice of animals. this is done at this point, directly at the movable altar. It further exemplifies similarity with other forms of worship having utilized such sacrifices. The differences as noted, being the movement and focus as per a single reference point - though encompassing (as expressed in Genesis) several different "traits" of said point of focus. ~

As further observation - and as briefly explored pertaining to the lack of such motion in modern versions of this form of worship - said attained rigidity (non-motion in this instance) of said points of worship - then, on a larger scale as noted, begin to resemble the earlier (multiple/stationary) - focus in worship. ~

In regard to "sacrifice," there has also been various forms of mimicry developed in regard to those examples as well - some even manifesting as forms of "Satanism" so to speak - utilizing humans to represent metaphorically, the denoted types of animals acceptable as sacrifice. ~

Further there have been developed applications of such writ in a manner as to demand a residence of sort within a specific area of this work, itself. A given "book" for instance.

In my personal opinion, this is no more efficient than is listening to the same four bars of any musical piece repeated over a given "life time" so to speak. Only perhaps another effort in said mimicry.. and yet more so even in the effort of some form of compliance - then itself being indication of said mutations.

Specifically in such an instance, that which is comprised of modern, computerized interpretation through that layer of imposed limitation upon the existing limitations inherent in the entirety of the work itself.

It is an interesting age in which it seems we still struggle to move into - those forms of imposed limitations being obvious indicators of such, to say the least. ~

Studies In Theology - 09/25/2006

2006-11-16T15:13:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -09/25/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

09/25/2006

Reading Exodus 13:20, I am inclined to wonder about a volcanic eruption being the "pillar of cloud" in the day and "pillar of fire through the night." ~

It is stated that Moses did not travel the known shortest path toward their destination - I would be curious to research known volcanic eruptions and activity of and within the general time period. ~

Reading further, it is that through Moses - Aaron was appointed a priest of sorts to oversee worship of the tabernacle.

As is known, when Moses went to the mountain, Aaron then fashioned a golden calf and presented it for worship in front of the newly constructed tent which housed the "arc" and "tabernacle." ~

Symbolically I cannot help but see a re-occurrence played out in this description of events. This re-occurrence being reminiscent of that which is said to have transpired between "God" and Lucifer. ~

Aaron having been appointed and adorned ornately in a similar perceived importance as is said was Lucifer in the service of "God." ~

This isn't meant as a direct comparison in suggesting Moses as "God" and Aaron, as Lucifer.... only an observation of a continued - re-occurring aspect within what I feel is our emulation in existence. As if both relationships are being depicted as similar in substance that is to say. ~

Something that perhaps many do not consider is in Aaron's appointment was also the responsibility of taking upon himself, the guilt of those bringing offerings.

Perhaps this was much inspiration for having strayed from instructions so extremely? ~

Perhaps he saw himself more a deity upon being anointed, than as a servant? ~

It is said that moses even fell to such tendencies eventually as per those writ... meaning that eventually even Moses succumbed to the allure of power to some degree. ~

In considering it as per the appointment of Aaron in anointing him with the same sacrificial blood as was spattered to the altar... then further presenting him with unleavened food stuffs in the area of the tabernacle - perhaps it was symbolically presenting him as a sort of extended sacrificial element? Especially considering the aspect of taking upon himself (and his family line presumably), the guilt of those remitting offerings.

This suggests some early foreshadowing yet again - though with a somewhat different approach - to and of the idea and action of "Christ" representing the payment of sin. ~

It shows even a developing pattern of such... as if in attempts to find something more efficient pertaining to such perceived needs.

Further as observation pertaining to the social aspects of "worship" and further, a difference between other existing versions of religion in the time period - is the "place" of worship within this text - is most definitely designed to be mobile. Serving a nomadic aspect of the people described - the "Israelites" as it were.

A most curious thing considering the presently past rather generalized location of the entirety of said "Israelites." Rather a notable shift in common social respects.

Other forms of religion from that time period, placed different deities in various places in or around a given community. This new "Israelite" version presented one point of focus - one "God" so to speak, which seemingly was meant to "move around."

As I have explored and as has been suggested in several ways within the work itself - this could have had other resulting effects due to "proximity," as it were.

Again citing the importance and different perceptions of various deities in different areas and location as per other established societies - achieving, more so "perceiving" said different effects with the "nomadic aspects" of and from one point of focus - instead of several points of focus in different areas and location. ~

Perhaps as a venture in thought, even yielding subtle combinations in variation of those obviously existing influences so widely given attention to and so specifically separated - and perceived as separate - in other existing cultures? This as result of said "nomadic" tendencies and further in the inconsistency of placement regarding that mobile point of focus. ~

In a metaphor - being the dial of a radio receiver for instance - even "receiving" combinations of "frequency(for lack of a better depiction)" for instance - as opposed to dragging the radio to a specific point in location to "tune in" a "specific channel" so to speak. ~

As they moved around with it perhaps (that single point of focus) - then finding a different effect in perceived result not attainable in the other existing and firm structures. ~

This as per the difference a person can experience between different altitudes for instance. At sea level, things are naturally perceived with subtle differences than atop a mountain peak - in fact, from experiences - even light reflects and refracts differently between the two extremes of perception. ~

In this nomadic tendency, within the effects and change of proximity - something similar may have been the case. ~

As further example in what we can experience in a larger sense as difference in culture from society to society - may well have been subtly present in those changes of proximity. Even the differences which could be represented in the tendency toward those separate locations and deities.

Further as observation in the progress of humanity, is the change observable in a pronounced lack of said nomadic qualities. ~

The very things developed as forms of worship from said nomadic tendencies, are now practiced with little or no change in location - except of course in regard to wide spread practices.

There again, is a sort of inversion being that it is now no longer a nomadic motion so to speak, but again being various locations of specific consistencies.

As a note in regard to this effect in "proximity," is very much the differences even within the same "faith" practices from place to place. ~

This no longer manifesting in the same social body of people as a new nomadic change - but manifesting in regard to given proximity, in different bodies - social elements- of people. ~

Where once these subtle differences "flowed" through a society (though nomadic), they now simply churn as it were, in areas of consistent differences - on a larger scale. ~

Though I do not want to pursue thought of it in depth at this moment, nearing rest for the evening - this then illustrates a "metaphoric," suggested cyclical element which I have observed in other aspects within existence.

A metaphoric geometrical change in social terrain - dynamic - which then tends to resemble a re-occurrence of other "divisions" so to speak. ~

Studies In Theology - 09/24/2006

2006-11-16T11:52:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -09/24/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

09/24/2006

So I am reading Exodus now - Moses, the burning bush... on and such.

I happen upon a curious suggestion of "inversions" - which then suggests much more in a metaphorical procession. In Exodus 4:22, "God" tells Moses to tell Pharaoh that "Israel" is "Gods" first born son... then of course the curse and such.

As if it weren't immediately obvious - the particularly interesting part is pertaining to the reference to "Israel." ~

As established, Jacob was renamed Israel, presumably by a manifestation of "God" whom he "wrestled."

Jacob was the youngest child of twins - who managed to swindle his older brother's birthright, then with the aid of his mother - steal his furry, older brother's blessings as well. ~

This suggests several possibilities in reference here - one of which being the interpretation of the tribes of Israel being considered metaphorically as a "body" so to speak, and then further as a body being regarded as "Gods" first born son - a "first born movement" if you will - which then further substantiates the idea of a form of serogate social workings. This even in light of the namesake being a "youngest" child. ~

In another regard as per said "inversion" - it may suggest that through a presumed inter-connectivity, that there exists a reflective quality - being that the youngest child is somewhat perceived - or presumably so - on the "other side" of said reflective quality, as the first born - oldest, that is to say. ~

further, as an interesting point - this then suggests that an existing "border" so to speak - between said "reflective" area of interpretation and our reality - was displaced. Encroached upon so to speak - then rendering the physical happening of said "youngest" being regarded with the respects of the "oldest." ~

Even further then, this suggests the "female" element within our reality being more prone (as demonstrated in the example situation) to the influence of said displacement - having readily participated in the deception used to manifest the perceived inversion within the social dynamic of the time in which it transpired. ~

To again consider the idea of "Israel" metaphorically as a body, even suggest that more such "bodies" were/are to come within the associated suggestion of "Israel" being a "first born" when considered outside of the association with "Jacob" directly. It is even put to Moses to refer to "Israel" as a "son." ~

When I consider this further, it presents several interesting perspectives.

since "Israel" is now referred to as a "body," - a first born son, no less - it suggests then another aspect of the "multiple" elements present in a single point of focus - meaning that "son" suggests as well, a mother figure.~

This then in the consistency having been established concerning "birthright," suggests that "Israel" - being first born - will not receive the blessings due the first born - as per said newly established progression in the youngest having received such blessings. ~

Beyond those aspects, is then suggested relation in the manner I have suggested as per inter-connected symbolism, with "Christ" - himself being known as the personification of "Gods only begotten son."

Much being suggested in such a relation - even metaphorically.

It is enough to give inspiration in looking forward to more in depth study as I mature. ~

Self adulation paradox? ~

"Israel" = "Christ" = "Christianity" = any Israelite believing themselves to be such - chosen people as it were - then immediately subject to a self adulation paradox in considering the presented procession of events and symbolic relation? ~

Definitely interesting subject matter. `

Further then, what of the potential interpretation that perhaps "God" is justifying the manipulative ploy in having stolen the blessings, through then proclaiming Jacob (Israel) "HIS" eldest son... somehow superseding the more "mortal" version in claiming Jacob to be the son of "God."

Again in Exodus 12 is a reference to "bread made without yeast" - beyond the other appearing consistencies of this, is very much the fact that it is purposeful in excluding the leavening agent -(This meal is considered the first "Passover" in Exodus 12) which suggests such was purposeful in differentiating it from common bread. Perhaps in effort of connection with times before the use of yeast? ~

Symbolically then, "Israel" being declared "Gods First Born Son," was the only first born son of any variation not killed during passover (sans the lambs blood of course).

This presents some area of interest as well for future studies - especially in regard to the "inversion" and further the post of "Joseph" in Egypt and his relationship with Jacob (Israel) - the name sake of "Gods First Born" body of people, presumably. ~

11/16/2006 As a personal note, I think it to be of some considerable interest as well, that the Egyptian embalming process was used when Joseph died and was entombed. Then again at the passing of Jacob, similar respects were made. In a symbolic sense, this then associates "Israel" with even the Pharaohs as per similar respects being made at the time of death.

"Passover" is then noted specifically as a festival of "unleavened bread." ~

Then again, the dictation of seven (7) days - which I see as again coinciding with the 7 enclosures in the as of yet developed, Star Of David.

11/16/2006 To consider this in regard to symbolism, connection and of course in considering that old tradition of growing mold on bread in tomb like atmospheres.... then further taking into account the manner in which Jacob and Joseph were said to have been embalmed and entombed... then further with the significance of the re-occurring enumeration(s) in consistent manners..... it could be reasoned that symbolically, there is a connection with those having been entombed in those early years, and the ceremonial use of bread as has been depicted.... sans the leavening agent (being a living organism, perhaps?). A form of symbolic transference if not a sort of invitation to re-incarnate? To again be a part of the living order as if to want of some manner to impart the better qualities of that which has been, into that which is and has yet to come?

Truly some things to be considered in more mature and learned years.

Studies In Theology - 09/23/2006

2006-11-15T09:22:00.000-08:00

STUDIES IN THEOLOGY;

Popular Christianity -09/23/2006

Study Notes And Journal Entries,

An Observation

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

09/23/2006

I have happened upon something that I find rather exciting in an exploratory fashion.

Though it is that I know little of the particular importance of "numbers" and the "Book of Numbers" in relation to various forms of Western religions, I do know of their importance - this from even early childhood.

I as well know that there are some excessive and even obsessive social derivatives of said "importance" which results in an over amplification and mutation of it.

The aspect I find a small thrill with is in a sequence I can see possible direction for further exploration of.

As I read Genesis 46, I find this particular little "thrill" in connection with previous suggestions - one of which being in the story of Joseph interpreting Pharoahs dreams pertaining to "feast or famine."

In essence he essentially suggests that he is/or has a direct affiliation with "God." A person could even interpret the statement as if he were even claiming to be "god" itself - beyond any sort of embodiment. ~

Taking that into account (as well as the station of Governor he was awarded), then in conjunction with the census total of his father (Jacob's) descendants that then joined Joseph in Egypt being 66 - then further this making Jospeh 67 of a total being 70 of his Hebrew relatives now living in Egypt.

Initially this doesn't necessarily strike any chords until it is considered in conjunction with things yet to pass at this point in Genesis, being chapter 46.

The most obvious to me, as per the comparison is that there is a total of 66 books in the work known as the "Bible." Then further a person can consider the Star of David being comprised of 6 points and 7 enclosures - "wells" so to speak. ~

Most certainly this is exploratory - but reasonable speculation in my own opinion for several reasons - the first of which being the apparent early importance of enumeration. Further then is the developing consistency within the work itself, as I have mentioned - to "weave" upon itself as per the symbolism being similar in various places - "bread and wine" for instance at the "last supper," then found as well in several places through out the old testament - thus far being in Genesis.

Further then, these associations even between "old" and "new" testaments acting to bind earlier works immersed in the Hebrew influence, with those of developed "Christianity" during and after the introduction of "Christ." ~

This then places much of the entirety in symbolism, in a firm connection with the Hebrew aspects of existence, even in Egypt (as per the accounts of this work).

As a note; Egypt was one of the many cultures having and supporting more than one deity - even affording the idea of the Hebrew "God" being a single point of focus as is illustrated with the acceptance of Joseph.

Then further to support this speculation is Jacobs name given him after he "wrestled with god" - that name being "Israel." ~

Another point of interest in chapter 48 of Genesis, is a continuation - then on establishing similar blessings as those that Jacob and his mother stole for Jacob - being the youngest - then being past from Jacob in the form of blessing - to Josephs youngest son. This in effect establishes a consistency in no longer adhering to the "old ways" of passing things to the oldest son.

In Genesis 50, it is noted that Jacob (Israel) was embalmed after his death in the Egyptian method.

At the time of Josephs death, he was embalmed and placed in a coffin in Egypt, leaving instructions for his remains ("his bones") to be brought from Egypt "when god comes to lead you back." ~

In 50;24 of Genesis, it is further divulged that "God" will deliver the house of Jacob (being the 12 houses of Israel) back to the land promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. This poses points of interest to me for further (future) studies. Particularly the perception that the "promised land" is that only of and for "Israel." ~

It is noted as well, that the Dead Sea Scrolls count all of Josephs relatives in Egypt initially, being 75. So this then obviously leads to some inconsistency between the accounts in the "Bible" and those of the Dead Sea Scrolls - BUT, the Dead Sea Scrolls do confirm that there was actually someone such as is described as Joseph within the Bible - then confirming to some extent the consistency of the "Bible." Really kind of funny that with the discovery of something that points to some inconsistency (Dead Sea Scrolls), there is support of the consistency itself.